2015•Annals of the American Thoracic SocietyRequires access

Provocative Dose of Methacholine Causing a 20% Drop in FEV1 Should Be Used to Interpret Methacholine Challenge Tests with Modern Nebulizers

Sharon Dell, Sundeep S. Bola, Richard G. Foty, Laura Marshall, Kathleen A. Nelligan, Allan L. Coates

Open publisher page 46 citations

Abstract

RATIONALE: The American Thoracic Society guidelines (1999) for methacholine challenge tests (MCTs) using the 2-minute tidal breathing protocol were developed for the now-obsolete English-Wright (EW) nebulizer. In addition, the guideline recommendation to use the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 (PC20) rather than the provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 (PD20) for determining the level of bronchial hyperresponsiveness has been challenged. OBJECTIVES: To determine if cumulative dose or concentration of methacholine delivered to the airways is the determinant for airway responsiveness and to validate use of the AeroEclipse* II BAN (Aero; Trudell Medical International, London, ON, Canada) nebulizer compared with use of the reference standard EW nebulizer. METHODS: Subjects with asthma (10-18 yr old) participated in randomized, controlled cross-over experiments comparing four MCT protocols using standard methacholine concentrations, but varying: (1) methacholine starting concentration (testing for cumulative effect); (2) nebulizer (EW versus Aero); and (3) inhalation time. PD20 was calculated using nebulizer output rate, inhalation time, and preceding doses delivered. ANOVA analyses were used to compare geometric means of PC20 and PD20 between protocols. RESULTS: A total of 32 subjects (17 male) participated. PC20 differed when starting concentration varied (0.46 vs. 0.80 mg/ml; P<0.0001), whereas PD20 did not (0.06 vs. 0.08 mg). PC20 differed with the EW versus the Aero nebulzer with 30-second inhalation (1.19 vs. 0.43 mg/ml; P=0.0006) and the EW versus the Aero nebulizer with 20-second inhalation (1.91 vs. 0.89 mg/ml; P=0.0027), whereas PD20 did not (0.07 vs. 0.06 mg and 0.11 vs. 0.09 mg, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In MCTs, the cumulative dose (PD20), not the PC20, determines bronchial responsiveness. Modern nebulizers may be used for the test if clinical interpretation is based on PD20. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01288482).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

RATIONALE: The American Thoracic Society guidelines (1999) for methacholine challenge tests (MCTs) using the 2-minute tidal breathing protocol were developed for the now-obsolete English-Wright (EW) nebulizer. In addition, the guideline recommendation to use the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 (PC20) rather than the provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 (PD20) for determining the level of bronchial hyperresponsiveness has been challenged. OBJECTIVES: To determine if cumulative dose or concentration of methacholine delivered to the airways is the determinant for airway responsiveness and to validate use of the AeroEclipse* II BAN (Aero; Trudell Medical International, London, ON, Canada) nebulizer compared with use of the reference standard EW nebulizer. METHODS: Subjects with asthma (10-18 yr old) participated in randomized, controlled cross-over experiments comparing four MCT protocols using standard methacholine concentrations, but varying: (1) methacholine starting concentration (testing for cumulative effect); (2) nebulizer (EW versus Aero); and (3) inhalation time. PD20 was calculated using nebulizer output rate, inhalation time, and preceding doses delivered. ANOVA analyses were used to compare geometric means of PC20 and PD20 between protocols. RESULTS: A total of 32 subjects (17 male) participated. PC20 differed when starting concentration varied (0.46 vs. 0.80 mg/ml; P<0.0001), whereas PD20 did not (0.06 vs. 0.08 mg). PC20 differed with the EW versus the Aero nebulzer with 30-second inhalation (1.19 vs. 0.43 mg/ml; P=0.0006) and the EW versus the Aero nebulizer with 20-second inhalation (1.91 vs. 0.89 mg/ml; P=0.0027), whereas PD20 did not (0.07 vs. 0.06 mg and 0.11 vs. 0.09 mg, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In MCTs, the cumulative dose (PD20), not the PC20, determines bronchial responsiveness. Modern nebulizers may be used for the test if clinical interpretation is based on PD20. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01288482).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 46 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

RATIONALE: The American Thoracic Society guidelines (1999) for methacholine challenge tests (MCTs) using the 2-minute tidal breathing protocol were developed for the now-obsolete English-Wright (EW) nebulizer. In addition, the guideline recommendation to use the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 (PC20) rather than the provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 (PD20) for determining the level of bronchial hyperresponsiveness has been challenged. OBJECTIVES: To determine if cumulative dose or concentration of methacholine delivered to the airways is the determinant for airway responsiveness and to validate use of the AeroEclipse* II BAN (Aero; Trudell Medical International, London, ON, Canada) nebulizer compared with use of the reference standard EW nebulizer. METHODS: Subjects with asthma (10-18 yr old) participated in randomized, controlled cross-over experiments comparing four MCT protocols using standard methacholine concentrations, but varying: (1) methacholine starting concentration (testing for cumulative effect); (2) nebulizer (EW versus Aero); and (3) inhalation time. PD20 was calculated using nebulizer output rate, inhalation time, and preceding doses delivered. ANOVA analyses were used to compare geometric means of PC20 and PD20 between protocols. RESULTS: A total of 32 subjects (17 male) participated. PC20 differed when starting concentration varied (0.46 vs. 0.80 mg/ml; P<0.0001), whereas PD20 did not (0.06 vs. 0.08 mg). PC20 differed with the EW versus the Aero nebulzer with 30-second inhalation (1.19 vs. 0.43 mg/ml; P=0.0006) and the EW versus the Aero nebulizer with 20-second inhalation (1.91 vs. 0.89 mg/ml; P=0.0027), whereas PD20 did not (0.07 vs. 0.06 mg and 0.11 vs. 0.09 mg, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In MCTs, the cumulative dose (PD20), not the PC20, determines bronchial responsiveness. Modern nebulizers may be used for the test if clinical interpretation is based on PD20. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01288482).

Key concepts: Methacholine, Nebulizer, Medicine, Inhalation, Anesthesia, Asthma, Bronchial hyperresponsiveness, Respiratory disease

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Provocative Dose of Methacholine Causing a 20% Drop in FEV1 Should Be Used to Interpret Methacholine Challenge Tests with Modern Nebulizers — Research Paper | ScholarLens