The Relation of Rat-fleas to Plague in Shanghai
E. P. Hicks
Abstract
Open-access reader
E. P. Hicks
Abstract
Open-access reader
1. Though Shanghai is in close communication with ports in which plague is endemic, it has not suffered severely. 2. The number of human cases is small compared with the number of plague-infected rats found. 3. Both X. cheopis and C. fasciatus are found. Reasons are given for considering that X. cheopis is the chief agent in spreading plague, and that infection, being unlikely to reach Shanghai during the season when this flea flourishes, has difficulty in gaining a foothold. 4. The discrepancy between the number of cases of human and rat plague may possibly be explained by the habits of C. fasciatus.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
1. Though Shanghai is in close communication with ports in which plague is endemic, it has not suffered severely. 2. The number of human cases is small compared with the number of plague-infected rats found. 3. Both X. cheopis and C. fasciatus are found. Reasons are given for considering that X. cheopis is the chief agent in spreading plague, and that infection, being unlikely to reach Shanghai during the season when this flea flourishes, has difficulty in gaining a foothold. 4. The discrepancy between the number of cases of human and rat plague may possibly be explained by the habits of C. fasciatus.
Key concepts: Plague (disease), Xenopsylla, Flea, Biology, Veterinary medicine, Zoology, Geography, Medicine