2003Unpublished venueRequires access

Credible Threats, Reputation and Private Monitoring. ∗

Olivier Compte

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In principal-agent relationships, a termination threat is often thought to be an effective way to provide the agent with incentives to sustain high effort. We examine the credibility of termination threats in a setting where the principal only receives private signals concerning the other party’s (i.e. the agent’s) effort level. We also assume that with small probability, the principal is weak: termination is very costly for him. We show that the principal cannot avoid building a reputation from being a weak type, and as a result, there can be no equilibrium where the threat to terminate is credible, hence no equilibrium where the agent makes high effort. 1

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In principal-agent relationships, a termination threat is often thought to be an effective way to provide the agent with incentives to sustain high effort. We examine the credibility of termination threats in a setting where the principal only receives private signals concerning the other party’s (i.e. the agent’s) effort level. We also assume that with small probability, the principal is weak: termination is very costly for him. We show that the principal cannot avoid building a reputation from being a weak type, and as a result, there can be no equilibrium where the threat to terminate is credible, hence no equilibrium where the agent makes high effort. 1

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In principal-agent relationships, a termination threat is often thought to be an effective way to provide the agent with incentives to sustain high effort. We examine the credibility of termination threats in a setting where the principal only receives private signals concerning the other party’s (i.e. the agent’s) effort level. We also assume that with small probability, the principal is weak: termination is very costly for him. We show that the principal cannot avoid building a reputation from being a weak type, and as a result, there can be no equilibrium where the threat to terminate is credible, hence no equilibrium where the agent makes high effort. 1

Key concepts: Reputation, Principal (computer security), Credibility, Incentive, Private information retrieval, Business, Microeconomics, Principal–agent problem

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Credible Threats, Reputation and Private Monitoring. ∗ — Research Paper | ScholarLens