Credible Threats, Reputation and Private Monitoring. ∗
Olivier Compte
Abstract
Olivier Compte
Abstract
In principal-agent relationships, a termination threat is often thought to be an effective way to provide the agent with incentives to sustain high effort. We examine the credibility of termination threats in a setting where the principal only receives private signals concerning the other party’s (i.e. the agent’s) effort level. We also assume that with small probability, the principal is weak: termination is very costly for him. We show that the principal cannot avoid building a reputation from being a weak type, and as a result, there can be no equilibrium where the threat to terminate is credible, hence no equilibrium where the agent makes high effort. 1
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In principal-agent relationships, a termination threat is often thought to be an effective way to provide the agent with incentives to sustain high effort. We examine the credibility of termination threats in a setting where the principal only receives private signals concerning the other party’s (i.e. the agent’s) effort level. We also assume that with small probability, the principal is weak: termination is very costly for him. We show that the principal cannot avoid building a reputation from being a weak type, and as a result, there can be no equilibrium where the threat to terminate is credible, hence no equilibrium where the agent makes high effort. 1
Key concepts: Reputation, Principal (computer security), Credibility, Incentive, Private information retrieval, Business, Microeconomics, Principal–agent problem