1991•Discourse ProcessesRequires access

Papa pig just left for pigtown: Children's oral and written picture descriptions under varying instructions

Jeanne M. De Temple, Hsin‐Feng Wu, Catherine Elizabeth Snow

Open publisher page 29 citations

Abstract

Second‐ through fifth‐grade children were asked to describe pictures under four conditions: orally and in writing for both a present audience and for an absent child who would have to read the written description or listen to the recording and draw it. About half the 150 subjects were speakers of English as a second language. The four descriptions from each child were coded for variables reflecting dimensions expected to be sensitive to the differences in instruction and mode: quantity, specificity, density, main theme, and nar‐rativity. Children of all grades were sensitive to the task demands, though older children produced longer and more specific descriptions. A greater effect of the instruction was found in the oral than in the written descriptions; across grades the best performance occurred in the oral description for an absent audience. The written mode elicited more highly narrative descriptions in general. Home language environment had virtually no effect on quality of picture descriptions in any of the four conditions, suggesting that in school‐related language tasks such as those used here curricular factors and the school language environment constitute more powerful learning influences than the home language environment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Second‐ through fifth‐grade children were asked to describe pictures under four conditions: orally and in writing for both a present audience and for an absent child who would have to read the written description or listen to the recording and draw it. About half the 150 subjects were speakers of English as a second language. The four descriptions from each child were coded for variables reflecting dimensions expected to be sensitive to the differences in instruction and mode: quantity, specificity, density, main theme, and nar‐rativity. Children of all grades were sensitive to the task demands, though older children produced longer and more specific descriptions. A greater effect of the instruction was found in the oral than in the written descriptions; across grades the best performance occurred in the oral description for an absent audience. The written mode elicited more highly narrative descriptions in general. Home language environment had virtually no effect on quality of picture descriptions in any of the four conditions, suggesting that in school‐related language tasks such as those used here curricular factors and the school language environment constitute more powerful learning influences than the home language environment.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 29 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Second‐ through fifth‐grade children were asked to describe pictures under four conditions: orally and in writing for both a present audience and for an absent child who would have to read the written description or listen to the recording and draw it. About half the 150 subjects were speakers of English as a second language. The four descriptions from each child were coded for variables reflecting dimensions expected to be sensitive to the differences in instruction and mode: quantity, specificity, density, main theme, and nar‐rativity. Children of all grades were sensitive to the task demands, though older children produced longer and more specific descriptions. A greater effect of the instruction was found in the oral than in the written descriptions; across grades the best performance occurred in the oral description for an absent audience. The written mode elicited more highly narrative descriptions in general. Home language environment had virtually no effect on quality of picture descriptions in any of the four conditions, suggesting that in school‐related language tasks such as those used here curricular factors and the school language environment constitute more powerful learning influences than the home language environment.

Key concepts: Picture books, Computer science, Linguistics, Psychology, Mathematics education, Multimedia, Arithmetic, Visual arts

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Papa pig just left for pigtown: Children's oral and written picture descriptions under varying instructions — Research Paper | ScholarLens