1991•Expert SystemsRequires access

Multi‐domain expert systems

Chiang‐Choon Danny Poo, Hongjun Lü

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Abstract: The current trend in expert system building is domain‐specific, i.e. there is one expert system for each problem domain. The increased involvement of computers in the decision‐making process will inevitably lead to increased demand for expert systems. Based on the current approach to expert systems building, there will be a further proliferation of domain‐specific expert systems. This is because each application area produces an expert system tailored to its requirements. This manner of producing expert systems is inadequate and an increased expectation in the performance of expert systems will eventually call for a new approach to constructing them. This paper examines the growth in the use of expert systems, looks into the limitations and problems associated with present‐day domain‐specific expert systems and suggests a multi‐domain expert system architecture as a solution to the problem of increasingly disjointed domain‐specific expert systems resulting from uncontrolled proliferation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract: The current trend in expert system building is domain‐specific, i.e. there is one expert system for each problem domain. The increased involvement of computers in the decision‐making process will inevitably lead to increased demand for expert systems. Based on the current approach to expert systems building, there will be a further proliferation of domain‐specific expert systems. This is because each application area produces an expert system tailored to its requirements. This manner of producing expert systems is inadequate and an increased expectation in the performance of expert systems will eventually call for a new approach to constructing them. This paper examines the growth in the use of expert systems, looks into the limitations and problems associated with present‐day domain‐specific expert systems and suggests a multi‐domain expert system architecture as a solution to the problem of increasingly disjointed domain‐specific expert systems resulting from uncontrolled proliferation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract: The current trend in expert system building is domain‐specific, i.e. there is one expert system for each problem domain. The increased involvement of computers in the decision‐making process will inevitably lead to increased demand for expert systems. Based on the current approach to expert systems building, there will be a further proliferation of domain‐specific expert systems. This is because each application area produces an expert system tailored to its requirements. This manner of producing expert systems is inadequate and an increased expectation in the performance of expert systems will eventually call for a new approach to constructing them. This paper examines the growth in the use of expert systems, looks into the limitations and problems associated with present‐day domain‐specific expert systems and suggests a multi‐domain expert system architecture as a solution to the problem of increasingly disjointed domain‐specific expert systems resulting from uncontrolled proliferation.

Key concepts: Expert system, Subject-matter expert, Computer science, Domain (mathematical analysis), Legal expert system, Domain engineering, Process (computing), Risk analysis (engineering)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Multi‐domain expert systems — Research Paper | ScholarLens