2012Unpublished venueRequires access

The industry demands better demand response

Mike Zimmerman

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

The promise and hype surrounding the Smart Grid far exceeds its current capabilities. In no area is this truer than with Demand Response (DR) programs for the commercial building sector, which is responsible for 20 percent of energy demand and emissions in the United States. These concentrated pools of demand are a nightmare for ever-more strained utility grids, especially in major cities. As a result, utilities have created DR programs to provide financial incentives for building owners to reduce energy consumption during peak periods. This paper explores what these programs currently entail and why they are not working. It then presents and discusses an alternative that can break the major barriers to adoption of the Smart Grid - moving from a manual to the Optimized Demand Response system.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The promise and hype surrounding the Smart Grid far exceeds its current capabilities. In no area is this truer than with Demand Response (DR) programs for the commercial building sector, which is responsible for 20 percent of energy demand and emissions in the United States. These concentrated pools of demand are a nightmare for ever-more strained utility grids, especially in major cities. As a result, utilities have created DR programs to provide financial incentives for building owners to reduce energy consumption during peak periods. This paper explores what these programs currently entail and why they are not working. It then presents and discusses an alternative that can break the major barriers to adoption of the Smart Grid - moving from a manual to the Optimized Demand Response system.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The promise and hype surrounding the Smart Grid far exceeds its current capabilities. In no area is this truer than with Demand Response (DR) programs for the commercial building sector, which is responsible for 20 percent of energy demand and emissions in the United States. These concentrated pools of demand are a nightmare for ever-more strained utility grids, especially in major cities. As a result, utilities have created DR programs to provide financial incentives for building owners to reduce energy consumption during peak periods. This paper explores what these programs currently entail and why they are not working. It then presents and discusses an alternative that can break the major barriers to adoption of the Smart Grid - moving from a manual to the Optimized Demand Response system.

Key concepts: Demand response, Incentive, Smart grid, Environmental economics, Consumption (sociology), Peak demand, Grid, Energy consumption

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The industry demands better demand response — Research Paper | ScholarLens