2009Unpublished venueRequires access

On the application of BP decoding to convolutional and turbo codes

Ahmed Refaey, Sébastien Roy, Paul Fortier

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

We investigate a new approach to decode convolutional and turbo codes by means of the belief propagation (BP) decoder used for low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes. In addition, we introduce a general representation scheme for convolutional codes through parity check matrices. Also, the parity check matrices of turbo codes are derived by treating turbo codes as parallel concatenated convolutional codes. Indeed, the BP algorithm provides a very attractive general methodology for devising low complexity iterative decoding algorithms for all convolutional code classes as well as turbo codes. However, preliminary results show that BP decoding of turbo codes performs slightly worse than conventional maximum a posteriori (MAP) and soft output Viterbi algorithm (SOVA) algorithms which already are in use in turbo code decoders. Since these traditional turbo decoders have a higher complexity, the observed loss in performance with BP is more than compensated by a drastically lower implementation complexity. Moreover, given the encoding simplicity of turbo codes with respect to generic LDPC codes, the low decoding complexity brings about end-to-end efficiency.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We investigate a new approach to decode convolutional and turbo codes by means of the belief propagation (BP) decoder used for low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes. In addition, we introduce a general representation scheme for convolutional codes through parity check matrices. Also, the parity check matrices of turbo codes are derived by treating turbo codes as parallel concatenated convolutional codes. Indeed, the BP algorithm provides a very attractive general methodology for devising low complexity iterative decoding algorithms for all convolutional code classes as well as turbo codes. However, preliminary results show that BP decoding of turbo codes performs slightly worse than conventional maximum a posteriori (MAP) and soft output Viterbi algorithm (SOVA) algorithms which already are in use in turbo code decoders. Since these traditional turbo decoders have a higher complexity, the observed loss in performance with BP is more than compensated by a drastically lower implementation complexity. Moreover, given the encoding simplicity of turbo codes with respect to generic LDPC codes, the low decoding complexity brings about end-to-end efficiency.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We investigate a new approach to decode convolutional and turbo codes by means of the belief propagation (BP) decoder used for low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes. In addition, we introduce a general representation scheme for convolutional codes through parity check matrices. Also, the parity check matrices of turbo codes are derived by treating turbo codes as parallel concatenated convolutional codes. Indeed, the BP algorithm provides a very attractive general methodology for devising low complexity iterative decoding algorithms for all convolutional code classes as well as turbo codes. However, preliminary results show that BP decoding of turbo codes performs slightly worse than conventional maximum a posteriori (MAP) and soft output Viterbi algorithm (SOVA) algorithms which already are in use in turbo code decoders. Since these traditional turbo decoders have a higher complexity, the observed loss in performance with BP is more than compensated by a drastically lower implementation complexity. Moreover, given the encoding simplicity of turbo codes with respect to generic LDPC codes, the low decoding complexity brings about end-to-end efficiency.

Key concepts: Turbo code, Serial concatenated convolutional codes, Convolutional code, BCJR algorithm, Turbo equalizer, Computer science, Concatenated error correction code, Low-density parity-check code

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the application of BP decoding to convolutional and turbo codes — Research Paper | ScholarLens