1998•Unpublished venueRequires access

Software Requirements Negotiation: Some Lessons Learned

BARRY W. BOEHM, Alexander F. Egyed

Open publisher page 55 citations

Abstract

Negotiating requirements is one of the first steps in any software system life cycle, but its results have probably the most significant impact on the system's value. However, the processes of requirements negotiation are not well understood. We have had the opportunity to capture and analyze requirements negotiation behavior for groups of projects developing library multimedia archive systems, using an instrumented version of the USC WinWin groupware system for requirements negotiation. Some of the more illuminating results were: . Most stakeholder Win Conditions were noncontroversial (were not involved in Issues) . Negotiation activity varied by stakeholder role. . LCO package quality (measured by grading criteria) could be predicted by negotiation attributes. . WinWin increased cooperativeness, reduced friction, and helped focus on key issues. Keywords Requirements negotiation, WinWin , Metrics, Groupware. 1 INTRODUCTION Involved in the projects were a dozen librarians from...

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Negotiating requirements is one of the first steps in any software system life cycle, but its results have probably the most significant impact on the system's value. However, the processes of requirements negotiation are not well understood. We have had the opportunity to capture and analyze requirements negotiation behavior for groups of projects developing library multimedia archive systems, using an instrumented version of the USC WinWin groupware system for requirements negotiation. Some of the more illuminating results were: . Most stakeholder Win Conditions were noncontroversial (were not involved in Issues) . Negotiation activity varied by stakeholder role. . LCO package quality (measured by grading criteria) could be predicted by negotiation attributes. . WinWin increased cooperativeness, reduced friction, and helped focus on key issues. Keywords Requirements negotiation, WinWin , Metrics, Groupware. 1 INTRODUCTION Involved in the projects were a dozen librarians from...

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 55 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Negotiating requirements is one of the first steps in any software system life cycle, but its results have probably the most significant impact on the system's value. However, the processes of requirements negotiation are not well understood. We have had the opportunity to capture and analyze requirements negotiation behavior for groups of projects developing library multimedia archive systems, using an instrumented version of the USC WinWin groupware system for requirements negotiation. Some of the more illuminating results were: . Most stakeholder Win Conditions were noncontroversial (were not involved in Issues) . Negotiation activity varied by stakeholder role. . LCO package quality (measured by grading criteria) could be predicted by negotiation attributes. . WinWin increased cooperativeness, reduced friction, and helped focus on key issues. Keywords Requirements negotiation, WinWin , Metrics, Groupware. 1 INTRODUCTION Involved in the projects were a dozen librarians from...

Key concepts: Negotiation, Stakeholder, Computer science, Process management, Knowledge management, Requirements analysis, Cooperativeness, Software

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Software Requirements Negotiation: Some Lessons Learned — Research Paper | ScholarLens