Software Requirements Negotiation: Some Lessons Learned
BARRY W. BOEHM, Alexander F. Egyed
Abstract
BARRY W. BOEHM, Alexander F. Egyed
Abstract
Negotiating requirements is one of the first steps in any software system life cycle, but its results have probably the most significant impact on the system's value. However, the processes of requirements negotiation are not well understood. We have had the opportunity to capture and analyze requirements negotiation behavior for groups of projects developing library multimedia archive systems, using an instrumented version of the USC WinWin groupware system for requirements negotiation. Some of the more illuminating results were: . Most stakeholder Win Conditions were noncontroversial (were not involved in Issues) . Negotiation activity varied by stakeholder role. . LCO package quality (measured by grading criteria) could be predicted by negotiation attributes. . WinWin increased cooperativeness, reduced friction, and helped focus on key issues. Keywords Requirements negotiation, WinWin , Metrics, Groupware. 1 INTRODUCTION Involved in the projects were a dozen librarians from...
OpenAlex reports 55 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Negotiating requirements is one of the first steps in any software system life cycle, but its results have probably the most significant impact on the system's value. However, the processes of requirements negotiation are not well understood. We have had the opportunity to capture and analyze requirements negotiation behavior for groups of projects developing library multimedia archive systems, using an instrumented version of the USC WinWin groupware system for requirements negotiation. Some of the more illuminating results were: . Most stakeholder Win Conditions were noncontroversial (were not involved in Issues) . Negotiation activity varied by stakeholder role. . LCO package quality (measured by grading criteria) could be predicted by negotiation attributes. . WinWin increased cooperativeness, reduced friction, and helped focus on key issues. Keywords Requirements negotiation, WinWin , Metrics, Groupware. 1 INTRODUCTION Involved in the projects were a dozen librarians from...
Key concepts: Negotiation, Stakeholder, Computer science, Process management, Knowledge management, Requirements analysis, Cooperativeness, Software