2009•Behavioral EcologyRequires access

Parasitic cowbirds may defeat host defense by causing rejecters to misimprint on cowbird eggs

Bill M. Strausberger, Stephen I. Rothstein

Open publisher page 42 citations

Abstract

Experiments suggest that some hosts that reject parasitic brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater) eggs develop egg recognition by imprinting on their own eggs, probably at the first nest naïve birds attend. This raises the possibility that parasitism of naïve individuals might cause them to mistakenly misimprint on, and accept, cowbird eggs. In an egg-learning experiment designed to cause misimprinting, hosts accepted cowbird eggs when they had laid only 1 egg even though most rejected cowbird eggs when nests had ≥2 host eggs. These findings show that cowbirds can cause misimprinting by parasitizing naïve hosts. If done opportunistically, misimprinting should become more likely as cowbird abundance increases. In accord with this expectation, simulated brood parasitism showed that 3 host species that usually reject cowbird eggs were more tolerant of cowbird eggs in the Great Plains, where cowbirds reach maximal historic abundance, than in eastern North America where cowbirds are less common. This relation between parasite abundance and host responses is opposite to that found in cuckoo hosts. In addition, these 3 rejecter species had high rates (10.8–30.4%) of natural cowbird parasitism at an Illinois site where cowbirds are extremely, and historically, abundant. These rejecters accepted most cases of researcher-detected parasitism, even though they rarely accept where cowbirds are less common. Despite the potentially high cost resulting from egg rejection, we demonstrate that parasitism of “rejecters” can be adaptive for cowbirds particularly when host egg recognition involves learning.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Experiments suggest that some hosts that reject parasitic brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater) eggs develop egg recognition by imprinting on their own eggs, probably at the first nest naïve birds attend. This raises the possibility that parasitism of naïve individuals might cause them to mistakenly misimprint on, and accept, cowbird eggs. In an egg-learning experiment designed to cause misimprinting, hosts accepted cowbird eggs when they had laid only 1 egg even though most rejected cowbird eggs when nests had ≥2 host eggs. These findings show that cowbirds can cause misimprinting by parasitizing naïve hosts. If done opportunistically, misimprinting should become more likely as cowbird abundance increases. In accord with this expectation, simulated brood parasitism showed that 3 host species that usually reject cowbird eggs were more tolerant of cowbird eggs in the Great Plains, where cowbirds reach maximal historic abundance, than in eastern North America where cowbirds are less common. This relation between parasite abundance and host responses is opposite to that found in cuckoo hosts. In addition, these 3 rejecter species had high rates (10.8–30.4%) of natural cowbird parasitism at an Illinois site where cowbirds are extremely, and historically, abundant. These rejecters accepted most cases of researcher-detected parasitism, even though they rarely accept where cowbirds are less common. Despite the potentially high cost resulting from egg rejection, we demonstrate that parasitism of “rejecters” can be adaptive for cowbirds particularly when host egg recognition involves learning.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 42 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Experiments suggest that some hosts that reject parasitic brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater) eggs develop egg recognition by imprinting on their own eggs, probably at the first nest naïve birds attend. This raises the possibility that parasitism of naïve individuals might cause them to mistakenly misimprint on, and accept, cowbird eggs. In an egg-learning experiment designed to cause misimprinting, hosts accepted cowbird eggs when they had laid only 1 egg even though most rejected cowbird eggs when nests had ≥2 host eggs. These findings show that cowbirds can cause misimprinting by parasitizing naïve hosts. If done opportunistically, misimprinting should become more likely as cowbird abundance increases. In accord with this expectation, simulated brood parasitism showed that 3 host species that usually reject cowbird eggs were more tolerant of cowbird eggs in the Great Plains, where cowbirds reach maximal historic abundance, than in eastern North America where cowbirds are less common. This relation between parasite abundance and host responses is opposite to that found in cuckoo hosts. In addition, these 3 rejecter species had high rates (10.8–30.4%) of natural cowbird parasitism at an Illinois site where cowbirds are extremely, and historically, abundant. These rejecters accepted most cases of researcher-detected parasitism, even though they rarely accept where cowbirds are less common. Despite the potentially high cost resulting from egg rejection, we demonstrate that parasitism of “rejecters” can be adaptive for cowbirds particularly when host egg recognition involves learning.

Key concepts: Cowbird, Brood parasite, Parasitism, Biology, Nest (protein structural motif), Host (biology), Cuckoo, Ecology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Parasitic cowbirds may defeat host defense by causing rejecters to misimprint on cowbird eggs — Research Paper | ScholarLens