2013•Unpublished venueRequires access

Mind the GAP: Questioning the Investment Manager’s Stated Benchmark

BaileyPanagiota

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Selecting and monitoring fund investments is an arduous task, with no guarantee of success. For the majority of funds, the investment and due diligence process involves an evaluation of past performance and risk exposure relative to some benchmark. Thus, the choice of benchmark is critical in this context, and simply adopting the investment manager’s stated benchmark for fund analysis may not yield accurate results. To help with this task, I developed the concept of “GAP” analysis—an easy-to-calculate measure for identifying the presence and extent of sub-optimality of the stated benchmark.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Selecting and monitoring fund investments is an arduous task, with no guarantee of success. For the majority of funds, the investment and due diligence process involves an evaluation of past performance and risk exposure relative to some benchmark. Thus, the choice of benchmark is critical in this context, and simply adopting the investment manager’s stated benchmark for fund analysis may not yield accurate results. To help with this task, I developed the concept of “GAP” analysis—an easy-to-calculate measure for identifying the presence and extent of sub-optimality of the stated benchmark.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Selecting and monitoring fund investments is an arduous task, with no guarantee of success. For the majority of funds, the investment and due diligence process involves an evaluation of past performance and risk exposure relative to some benchmark. Thus, the choice of benchmark is critical in this context, and simply adopting the investment manager’s stated benchmark for fund analysis may not yield accurate results. To help with this task, I developed the concept of “GAP” analysis—an easy-to-calculate measure for identifying the presence and extent of sub-optimality of the stated benchmark.

Key concepts: Benchmark (surveying), Due diligence, Context (archaeology), Task (project management), Investment (military), Process (computing), Investment management, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Mind the GAP: Questioning the Investment Manager’s Stated Benchmark — Research Paper | ScholarLens