2003Unpublished venueOpen access

Precise call graph construction in the presence of function pointers

Ana Milanova, Atanas Rountev, Barbara G. Ryder

Open full text 19 citations

Abstract

The use of pointers presents serious problems for software productivity tools for software understanding, restructuring, and testing. Pointers enable indirect memory accesses through pointer dereferences, as well as indirect procedure calls (e.g., through function pointers in C). Such indirect-accesses and calls can be disambiguated with pointer analysis. In this paper we evaluate the precision of a pointer analysis by Zhang et al. (1996, 1998) for the purposes of call graph construction for C programs with function pointers. The analysis is implemented in the context of a production-strength code-browsing tool from Siemens Corporate Research. The analysis uses an inexpensive, almost-linear flow- and context-insensitive algorithm. To measure analysis precision, we compare the call graph computed by the analysis with the most precise call graph obtainable by a large category of pointer analyses. Surprisingly, for all our data programs the analysis of Zhang et al. achieves the best possible precision. This result indicates that for the purposes of call graph construction, even inexpensive analyses can provide very good precision, and therefore the use of more expensive analyses may not be justified.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The use of pointers presents serious problems for software productivity tools for software understanding, restructuring, and testing. Pointers enable indirect memory accesses through pointer dereferences, as well as indirect procedure calls (e.g., through function pointers in C). Such indirect-accesses and calls can be disambiguated with pointer analysis. In this paper we evaluate the precision of a pointer analysis by Zhang et al. (1996, 1998) for the purposes of call graph construction for C programs with function pointers. The analysis is implemented in the context of a production-strength code-browsing tool from Siemens Corporate Research. The analysis uses an inexpensive, almost-linear flow- and context-insensitive algorithm. To measure analysis precision, we compare the call graph computed by the analysis with the most precise call graph obtainable by a large category of pointer analyses. Surprisingly, for all our data programs the analysis of Zhang et al. achieves the best possible precision. This result indicates that for the purposes of call graph construction, even inexpensive analyses can provide very good precision, and therefore the use of more expensive analyses may not be justified.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The use of pointers presents serious problems for software productivity tools for software understanding, restructuring, and testing. Pointers enable indirect memory accesses through pointer dereferences, as well as indirect procedure calls (e.g., through function pointers in C). Such indirect-accesses and calls can be disambiguated with pointer analysis. In this paper we evaluate the precision of a pointer analysis by Zhang et al. (1996, 1998) for the purposes of call graph construction for C programs with function pointers. The analysis is implemented in the context of a production-strength code-browsing tool from Siemens Corporate Research. The analysis uses an inexpensive, almost-linear flow- and context-insensitive algorithm. To measure analysis precision, we compare the call graph computed by the analysis with the most precise call graph obtainable by a large category of pointer analyses. Surprisingly, for all our data programs the analysis of Zhang et al. achieves the best possible precision. This result indicates that for the purposes of call graph construction, even inexpensive analyses can provide very good precision, and therefore the use of more expensive analyses may not be justified.

Key concepts: Pointer analysis, Call graph, Computer science, Pointer (user interface), Static analysis, Graph, Software, Programming language

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Precise call graph construction in the presence of function pointers — Research Paper | ScholarLens