A Survey of CDIO Implementation Globally - Effects on Educational Quality
Johan Malmqvist, Ron Hugo, Malin Kjellberg
Abstract
Open-access reader
Johan Malmqvist, Ron Hugo, Malin Kjellberg
Abstract
Open-access reader
The CDIO approach to engineering education was introduced in the early 2000’s. Some universities have gained considerable long-term experience in applying the approach, and consequently it seems timely to summarize and evaluate those experiences. This paper thus reports the results of a survey distributed to all members of the CDIO Initiative in October 2014. The aims of the survey were to:•Map out where and in what programs/disciplines CDIO is currently applied•Evaluate the effects on outcomes, the perceived benefits, the limitations, any barriers to implementation, and ascertain future development needsForty-seven universities from twenty-two countries participated in the survey. The main findings from the survey include the following:•The most common engineering disciplines in which CDIO is implemented are Mechanical, Electrical, and Computer Engineering. However, many CDIO schools have also implemented CDIO in Industrial, Civil and Chemical Engineering.•The main motives for choosing to adapt CDIO are; ambitions to make engineering education more authentic; the need for a systematic methodology for educational design; and the desire to include more design and innovation in curricula.•Most CDIO implementations successfully achieve both goals for learning and for external recognition of educational quality.
OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The CDIO approach to engineering education was introduced in the early 2000’s. Some universities have gained considerable long-term experience in applying the approach, and consequently it seems timely to summarize and evaluate those experiences. This paper thus reports the results of a survey distributed to all members of the CDIO Initiative in October 2014. The aims of the survey were to:•Map out where and in what programs/disciplines CDIO is currently applied•Evaluate the effects on outcomes, the perceived benefits, the limitations, any barriers to implementation, and ascertain future development needsForty-seven universities from twenty-two countries participated in the survey. The main findings from the survey include the following:•The most common engineering disciplines in which CDIO is implemented are Mechanical, Electrical, and Computer Engineering. However, many CDIO schools have also implemented CDIO in Industrial, Civil and Chemical Engineering.•The main motives for choosing to adapt CDIO are; ambitions to make engineering education more authentic; the need for a systematic methodology for educational design; and the desire to include more design and innovation in curricula.•Most CDIO implementations successfully achieve both goals for learning and for external recognition of educational quality.
Key concepts: CDIO, Quality (philosophy), Engineering education, Engineering management, Engineering, Engineering ethics, Computer science, Medical education