Differentiation of Leuconostoc species by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-dependent d(−)-lactic dehydrogenase profiles
Leon M. T. Dicks, H. J. J. van Vuuren
Abstract
Open-access reader
Leon M. T. Dicks, H. J. J. van Vuuren
Abstract
Open-access reader
The electrophoretic mobility of the d(−)-nLDH's of Leuconostoc oenos (nine strains), Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides (one strain), Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. dextranicum (one strain), Leuconostroc lactis (three strains), Leuconostoc paramesenteroides (two strains) and a Leuconostoc sp. were compared using conventional and stacked polyacrylamide gels. A singel diffused d(−)-nLDH band was obtained for each strain on a 7% acrylamide gel. However, several well defined d(−)-nLDH bands were obtained for each strain when a polyacrylamide stacked gel was used. Based on d(−)-nLDH profiles of strains of L. oenos were different from those obtained for the non-acidophilic Leuconostoc spp. Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides and L. mesenteroides subsp. dextranicum had similar d-nLDH profiles. The overall d(−)-nLDH profiles of L. lactis corresponded well. Different d(−)-nLDH profiles were obtained for L. paramesenteroides DSM 20201 and the type strain of L. paramesenteroides (DSM 20288T). The d(−)-nLDH profile of Leuconostoc sp. ATCC 21436 corresponded well with the profile obtained for the d(−)-nLDH electrophoretic marker of Lactobacillus leichmannii.
OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The electrophoretic mobility of the d(−)-nLDH's of Leuconostoc oenos (nine strains), Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides (one strain), Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. dextranicum (one strain), Leuconostroc lactis (three strains), Leuconostoc paramesenteroides (two strains) and a Leuconostoc sp. were compared using conventional and stacked polyacrylamide gels. A singel diffused d(−)-nLDH band was obtained for each strain on a 7% acrylamide gel. However, several well defined d(−)-nLDH bands were obtained for each strain when a polyacrylamide stacked gel was used. Based on d(−)-nLDH profiles of strains of L. oenos were different from those obtained for the non-acidophilic Leuconostoc spp. Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides and L. mesenteroides subsp. dextranicum had similar d-nLDH profiles. The overall d(−)-nLDH profiles of L. lactis corresponded well. Different d(−)-nLDH profiles were obtained for L. paramesenteroides DSM 20201 and the type strain of L. paramesenteroides (DSM 20288T). The d(−)-nLDH profile of Leuconostoc sp. ATCC 21436 corresponded well with the profile obtained for the d(−)-nLDH electrophoretic marker of Lactobacillus leichmannii.
Key concepts: Leuconostoc mesenteroides, Leuconostoc, Strain (injury), Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, Biology, Biochemistry, Bacteria, Chemistry