1990FEMS Microbiology LettersOpen access

Differentiation of Leuconostoc species by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-dependent d(−)-lactic dehydrogenase profiles

Leon M. T. Dicks, H. J. J. van Vuuren

Open full text 12 citations

Abstract

The electrophoretic mobility of the d(−)-nLDH's of Leuconostoc oenos (nine strains), Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides (one strain), Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. dextranicum (one strain), Leuconostroc lactis (three strains), Leuconostoc paramesenteroides (two strains) and a Leuconostoc sp. were compared using conventional and stacked polyacrylamide gels. A singel diffused d(−)-nLDH band was obtained for each strain on a 7% acrylamide gel. However, several well defined d(−)-nLDH bands were obtained for each strain when a polyacrylamide stacked gel was used. Based on d(−)-nLDH profiles of strains of L. oenos were different from those obtained for the non-acidophilic Leuconostoc spp. Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides and L. mesenteroides subsp. dextranicum had similar d-nLDH profiles. The overall d(−)-nLDH profiles of L. lactis corresponded well. Different d(−)-nLDH profiles were obtained for L. paramesenteroides DSM 20201 and the type strain of L. paramesenteroides (DSM 20288T). The d(−)-nLDH profile of Leuconostoc sp. ATCC 21436 corresponded well with the profile obtained for the d(−)-nLDH electrophoretic marker of Lactobacillus leichmannii.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The electrophoretic mobility of the d(−)-nLDH's of Leuconostoc oenos (nine strains), Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides (one strain), Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. dextranicum (one strain), Leuconostroc lactis (three strains), Leuconostoc paramesenteroides (two strains) and a Leuconostoc sp. were compared using conventional and stacked polyacrylamide gels. A singel diffused d(−)-nLDH band was obtained for each strain on a 7% acrylamide gel. However, several well defined d(−)-nLDH bands were obtained for each strain when a polyacrylamide stacked gel was used. Based on d(−)-nLDH profiles of strains of L. oenos were different from those obtained for the non-acidophilic Leuconostoc spp. Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides and L. mesenteroides subsp. dextranicum had similar d-nLDH profiles. The overall d(−)-nLDH profiles of L. lactis corresponded well. Different d(−)-nLDH profiles were obtained for L. paramesenteroides DSM 20201 and the type strain of L. paramesenteroides (DSM 20288T). The d(−)-nLDH profile of Leuconostoc sp. ATCC 21436 corresponded well with the profile obtained for the d(−)-nLDH electrophoretic marker of Lactobacillus leichmannii.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The electrophoretic mobility of the d(−)-nLDH's of Leuconostoc oenos (nine strains), Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides (one strain), Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. dextranicum (one strain), Leuconostroc lactis (three strains), Leuconostoc paramesenteroides (two strains) and a Leuconostoc sp. were compared using conventional and stacked polyacrylamide gels. A singel diffused d(−)-nLDH band was obtained for each strain on a 7% acrylamide gel. However, several well defined d(−)-nLDH bands were obtained for each strain when a polyacrylamide stacked gel was used. Based on d(−)-nLDH profiles of strains of L. oenos were different from those obtained for the non-acidophilic Leuconostoc spp. Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides and L. mesenteroides subsp. dextranicum had similar d-nLDH profiles. The overall d(−)-nLDH profiles of L. lactis corresponded well. Different d(−)-nLDH profiles were obtained for L. paramesenteroides DSM 20201 and the type strain of L. paramesenteroides (DSM 20288T). The d(−)-nLDH profile of Leuconostoc sp. ATCC 21436 corresponded well with the profile obtained for the d(−)-nLDH electrophoretic marker of Lactobacillus leichmannii.

Key concepts: Leuconostoc mesenteroides, Leuconostoc, Strain (injury), Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, Biology, Biochemistry, Bacteria, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Differentiation of Leuconostoc species by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-dependent d(−)-lactic dehydrogenase profiles — Research Paper | ScholarLens