2009•International Journal of Learning and ChangeRequires access

The complexity turn in studies of organisations and leadership: relevance and implications

Stig O. Johannessen

Open publisher page 39 citations

Abstract

The widespread experience of complexity is the experience of radical unpredictability and loss of clear connections between cause and effect. The typical response from leaders and researchers is to suggest that more complex contexts require new ways of management control and that particular ways of organising and leading are better than others in order to deal with this. However, the complexity orientation in organisational studies demonstrates that complexity is not a phenomenon that can be brought under control for subsequent analysis, manipulation and change from 'the outside'. What are the implications of this for the understanding of organisational dynamics and leadership? Complexity research is seeking to understand this by exploring what seems to be the core of the issue at hand: the interactional and paradoxical nature of leadership and organisational stability and change.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The widespread experience of complexity is the experience of radical unpredictability and loss of clear connections between cause and effect. The typical response from leaders and researchers is to suggest that more complex contexts require new ways of management control and that particular ways of organising and leading are better than others in order to deal with this. However, the complexity orientation in organisational studies demonstrates that complexity is not a phenomenon that can be brought under control for subsequent analysis, manipulation and change from 'the outside'. What are the implications of this for the understanding of organisational dynamics and leadership? Complexity research is seeking to understand this by exploring what seems to be the core of the issue at hand: the interactional and paradoxical nature of leadership and organisational stability and change.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 39 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The widespread experience of complexity is the experience of radical unpredictability and loss of clear connections between cause and effect. The typical response from leaders and researchers is to suggest that more complex contexts require new ways of management control and that particular ways of organising and leading are better than others in order to deal with this. However, the complexity orientation in organisational studies demonstrates that complexity is not a phenomenon that can be brought under control for subsequent analysis, manipulation and change from 'the outside'. What are the implications of this for the understanding of organisational dynamics and leadership? Complexity research is seeking to understand this by exploring what seems to be the core of the issue at hand: the interactional and paradoxical nature of leadership and organisational stability and change.

Key concepts: Phenomenon, Relevance (law), Control (management), Order (exchange), Complexity science, Leadership style, Public relations, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The complexity turn in studies of organisations and leadership: relevance and implications — Research Paper | ScholarLens