Convergence performances of various adaptive filter algorithms with application to system identification
Shihab Jimaa, Saeed Al-Ali
Abstract
Shihab Jimaa, Saeed Al-Ali
Abstract
This paper examines the performance of mean square error (MSE) using various adaptive filtering algorithms in the adaptation process of system identification over two defined communication channels. The MSE performances of the proposed algorithms are compared with that of the standard Normalized Least Mean Square (NLMS) algorithm. To enhance the adaptation performance, non-mean-square algorithms have been utilized, for instant, Least Mean Fourth (LMF) algorithm. Also, switching algorithm led to better performance. In this paper, random step size NLMS, switching between NLMS and LMF, and LMS+F mixed norm algorithms have been implemented and their performances over two defined Finite Impulse Response (FIR) channels were tested in comparison with the standard NLMS.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper examines the performance of mean square error (MSE) using various adaptive filtering algorithms in the adaptation process of system identification over two defined communication channels. The MSE performances of the proposed algorithms are compared with that of the standard Normalized Least Mean Square (NLMS) algorithm. To enhance the adaptation performance, non-mean-square algorithms have been utilized, for instant, Least Mean Fourth (LMF) algorithm. Also, switching algorithm led to better performance. In this paper, random step size NLMS, switching between NLMS and LMF, and LMS+F mixed norm algorithms have been implemented and their performances over two defined Finite Impulse Response (FIR) channels were tested in comparison with the standard NLMS.
Key concepts: Least mean squares filter, Adaptive filter, Algorithm, Finite impulse response, System identification, Convergence (economics), Mean squared error, Computer science