2011International Journal of Production ResearchRequires access

The X control chart for monitoring process shifts in mean and variance

Mei Yang, Zhang Wu, C.K.M. Lee, Michael B. C. Khoo

Open publisher page 25 citations

Abstract

Control charts are widely used in statistical process control (SPC) to monitor the quality of products or production processes. When dealing with a variable (e.g., the diameter of a shaft, the hardness of a component surface), it is necessary to monitor both its mean and variability (Montgomery 2009 Montgomery, DC. 2009. Introduction to statistical quality control, New York: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Montgomery, D.C., 2009. Introduction to statistical quality control. New York: John Wiley & Sons.]). This article studies and compares the overall performances of the X chart and the 3-CUSUM chart for this purpose. The latter is a combined scheme incorporating three individual CUSUM charts and is considered as the most effective scheme for detecting mean shift δμ and/or standard deviation shift δσ in current SPC literature. The results of the performance studies reveal two interesting findings: (1) the best sample size n for an chart is always n = 1, in other words, the simplest X chart (i.e., the chart with n = 1) is the most effective chart for detecting δμ and/or δσ; (2) the simplest X chart often outperforms the 3-CUSUM chart from an overall viewpoint unless the latter is redesigned by a difficult optimisation procedure. However, even the optimal 3-CUSUM chart is only slightly more effective than the X chart unless the process shift domain is quite small. Since the X chart is very simple to understand, implement and design, it may be more suitable in many SPC applications, in which both the mean and variance of a variable need to be monitored.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Control charts are widely used in statistical process control (SPC) to monitor the quality of products or production processes. When dealing with a variable (e.g., the diameter of a shaft, the hardness of a component surface), it is necessary to monitor both its mean and variability (Montgomery 2009 Montgomery, DC. 2009. Introduction to statistical quality control, New York: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Montgomery, D.C., 2009. Introduction to statistical quality control. New York: John Wiley & Sons.]). This article studies and compares the overall performances of the X chart and the 3-CUSUM chart for this purpose. The latter is a combined scheme incorporating three individual CUSUM charts and is considered as the most effective scheme for detecting mean shift δμ and/or standard deviation shift δσ in current SPC literature. The results of the performance studies reveal two interesting findings: (1) the best sample size n for an chart is always n = 1, in other words, the simplest X chart (i.e., the chart with n = 1) is the most effective chart for detecting δμ and/or δσ; (2) the simplest X chart often outperforms the 3-CUSUM chart from an overall viewpoint unless the latter is redesigned by a difficult optimisation procedure. However, even the optimal 3-CUSUM chart is only slightly more effective than the X chart unless the process shift domain is quite small. Since the X chart is very simple to understand, implement and design, it may be more suitable in many SPC applications, in which both the mean and variance of a variable need to be monitored.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Control charts are widely used in statistical process control (SPC) to monitor the quality of products or production processes. When dealing with a variable (e.g., the diameter of a shaft, the hardness of a component surface), it is necessary to monitor both its mean and variability (Montgomery 2009 Montgomery, DC. 2009. Introduction to statistical quality control, New York: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Montgomery, D.C., 2009. Introduction to statistical quality control. New York: John Wiley & Sons.]). This article studies and compares the overall performances of the X chart and the 3-CUSUM chart for this purpose. The latter is a combined scheme incorporating three individual CUSUM charts and is considered as the most effective scheme for detecting mean shift δμ and/or standard deviation shift δσ in current SPC literature. The results of the performance studies reveal two interesting findings: (1) the best sample size n for an chart is always n = 1, in other words, the simplest X chart (i.e., the chart with n = 1) is the most effective chart for detecting δμ and/or δσ; (2) the simplest X chart often outperforms the 3-CUSUM chart from an overall viewpoint unless the latter is redesigned by a difficult optimisation procedure. However, even the optimal 3-CUSUM chart is only slightly more effective than the X chart unless the process shift domain is quite small. Since the X chart is very simple to understand, implement and design, it may be more suitable in many SPC applications, in which both the mean and variance of a variable need to be monitored.

Key concepts: CUSUM, X-bar chart, EWMA chart, Statistical process control, Control chart, Chart, Shewhart individuals control chart, Statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The X control chart for monitoring process shifts in mean and variance — Research Paper | ScholarLens