2002•Unpublished venueRequires access

Fade margins for minimum duration outages in lognormal shadow fading and Rayleigh fading

Jie Lai, Narayan B. Mandayam

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Minimum duration outages have been used to characterize time-dependent performance in analysis of quantities such as average duration of an outage, the probability of outage, and the frequency of outage, in lognormal shadow fading (Mandayam et al., 1996) and Rayleigh fading (Lai and Mandayam, 1997), respectively. In this paper, we compare and contrast the effect of minimum duration outages on fade margin selection in channels subject to lognormal shadow fading and Rayleigh fading. A comparative analysis of relevant minimum durations for lognormal shadow fading and Rayleigh fading reveals the widely different time-scales active in outage considerations for each type of fading. Further, it is observed that lognormal shadow fading impacts outage on a time-scale that is much larger than that due to Rayleigh fading. The distinct time-scales revealed by the analysis show that the time-scales determined by the application govern the relative importance of the type of fading.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Minimum duration outages have been used to characterize time-dependent performance in analysis of quantities such as average duration of an outage, the probability of outage, and the frequency of outage, in lognormal shadow fading (Mandayam et al., 1996) and Rayleigh fading (Lai and Mandayam, 1997), respectively. In this paper, we compare and contrast the effect of minimum duration outages on fade margin selection in channels subject to lognormal shadow fading and Rayleigh fading. A comparative analysis of relevant minimum durations for lognormal shadow fading and Rayleigh fading reveals the widely different time-scales active in outage considerations for each type of fading. Further, it is observed that lognormal shadow fading impacts outage on a time-scale that is much larger than that due to Rayleigh fading. The distinct time-scales revealed by the analysis show that the time-scales determined by the application govern the relative importance of the type of fading.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Minimum duration outages have been used to characterize time-dependent performance in analysis of quantities such as average duration of an outage, the probability of outage, and the frequency of outage, in lognormal shadow fading (Mandayam et al., 1996) and Rayleigh fading (Lai and Mandayam, 1997), respectively. In this paper, we compare and contrast the effect of minimum duration outages on fade margin selection in channels subject to lognormal shadow fading and Rayleigh fading. A comparative analysis of relevant minimum durations for lognormal shadow fading and Rayleigh fading reveals the widely different time-scales active in outage considerations for each type of fading. Further, it is observed that lognormal shadow fading impacts outage on a time-scale that is much larger than that due to Rayleigh fading. The distinct time-scales revealed by the analysis show that the time-scales determined by the application govern the relative importance of the type of fading.

Key concepts: Fading, Rayleigh fading, Fading distribution, Log-normal distribution, Weibull fading, Channel state information, Shadow mapping, Statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fade margins for minimum duration outages in lognormal shadow fading and Rayleigh fading — Research Paper | ScholarLens