1961Academy of Management ProceedingsRequires access

Decentralization of Authority in a Bureaucracy.

Bernard H. Baum

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is not to discuss the specific details of decentralization of authority in the Federal Civil Service, but rather some of the more general problems of decentralization of authority in bureaucracy which my research highlights.[1] Students of management have become increasingly interested in the behavioral science approach to organization and administration. This interest is reflected in the papers presented at last year's meeting--particularly those of Professors Rubenstein and Moore, and Dean Schlender.[2] From my perspective as a sociologist this is as it should be. Let me note briefly the basis and limits of my observations. This case study involved the U.S. Civil Service Commission's[3] program of decentralization of authority for personnel management to the independent operating Federal agencies. To the extent then, that it is based on: 1. Governmental activity--decentralization of authority was legislated on a

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this paper is not to discuss the specific details of decentralization of authority in the Federal Civil Service, but rather some of the more general problems of decentralization of authority in bureaucracy which my research highlights.[1] Students of management have become increasingly interested in the behavioral science approach to organization and administration. This interest is reflected in the papers presented at last year's meeting--particularly those of Professors Rubenstein and Moore, and Dean Schlender.[2] From my perspective as a sociologist this is as it should be. Let me note briefly the basis and limits of my observations. This case study involved the U.S. Civil Service Commission's[3] program of decentralization of authority for personnel management to the independent operating Federal agencies. To the extent then, that it is based on: 1. Governmental activity--decentralization of authority was legislated on a

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this paper is not to discuss the specific details of decentralization of authority in the Federal Civil Service, but rather some of the more general problems of decentralization of authority in bureaucracy which my research highlights.[1] Students of management have become increasingly interested in the behavioral science approach to organization and administration. This interest is reflected in the papers presented at last year's meeting--particularly those of Professors Rubenstein and Moore, and Dean Schlender.[2] From my perspective as a sociologist this is as it should be. Let me note briefly the basis and limits of my observations. This case study involved the U.S. Civil Service Commission's[3] program of decentralization of authority for personnel management to the independent operating Federal agencies. To the extent then, that it is based on: 1. Governmental activity--decentralization of authority was legislated on a

Key concepts: Decentralization, Bureaucracy, Public administration, Administration (probate law), Political science, Civil service, Commission, Service (business)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Decentralization of Authority in a Bureaucracy. — Research Paper | ScholarLens