2004Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

Revisiting the Influence of Crash Report Forms on Work Zone Crash Data

G L Ullman, Tracy Scriba

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

Researchers present an analysis of work zone fatal crashes nationwide to assess possible underreporting due to differences in how information about a work zone crash is captured on standard state crash reporting forms. The possible effects of differences in crash report forms on work zone crash statistics were first identified in the mid-1990s, by using data from the Highway Safety Information System. The influence of different crash report forms on work zone crash data contained in the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) is examined. An investigation of the data contained in FARS from 1998 to 2000 indicates a statistically significant dependence between the way in which work zones are denoted on a state's crash report form and the percentage of fatalities that are coded as occurring in a work zone. From this analysis, it appears that existing data may underreport the number of fatalities that occur in work zones nationally by as much as 10%.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Researchers present an analysis of work zone fatal crashes nationwide to assess possible underreporting due to differences in how information about a work zone crash is captured on standard state crash reporting forms. The possible effects of differences in crash report forms on work zone crash statistics were first identified in the mid-1990s, by using data from the Highway Safety Information System. The influence of different crash report forms on work zone crash data contained in the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) is examined. An investigation of the data contained in FARS from 1998 to 2000 indicates a statistically significant dependence between the way in which work zones are denoted on a state's crash report form and the percentage of fatalities that are coded as occurring in a work zone. From this analysis, it appears that existing data may underreport the number of fatalities that occur in work zones nationally by as much as 10%.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Researchers present an analysis of work zone fatal crashes nationwide to assess possible underreporting due to differences in how information about a work zone crash is captured on standard state crash reporting forms. The possible effects of differences in crash report forms on work zone crash statistics were first identified in the mid-1990s, by using data from the Highway Safety Information System. The influence of different crash report forms on work zone crash data contained in the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) is examined. An investigation of the data contained in FARS from 1998 to 2000 indicates a statistically significant dependence between the way in which work zones are denoted on a state's crash report form and the percentage of fatalities that are coded as occurring in a work zone. From this analysis, it appears that existing data may underreport the number of fatalities that occur in work zones nationally by as much as 10%.

Key concepts: Crash, Work zone, Work (physics), Transport engineering, Forensic engineering, State (computer science), Statistics, Geography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Revisiting the Influence of Crash Report Forms on Work Zone Crash Data — Research Paper | ScholarLens