2011•International HealthRequires access

Outbreak response immunisation: the experience of Chad during recurrent measles epidemics in 2005 and 2010

Gilles Guerrier, José Guerra, Florence Fermon, W.B. Talkibing, Johanne Sekkenes, Rebecca F. Grais

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Despite impressive gains in measles control globally, measles epidemics continue to occur in countries with insufficient vaccination coverage. WHO guidelines now recommend outbreak response immunisation (ORI) for controlling measles outbreaks in certain contexts. The objective of this study was to describe late and early response vaccination activities during two consecutive measles outbreaks that occurred in 2005 and 2010 in N'Djamena, Chad. Using Lot Quality Assurance Sampling, vaccination coverage was estimated to be low before the interventions. Following mass vaccination campaigns, measles cases declined. The timeliness and quality of ORI activities are crucial determinants of success. However, effective outbreak response should be accompanied by strong routine vaccination programmes to ensure sustainable high vaccination coverage.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Despite impressive gains in measles control globally, measles epidemics continue to occur in countries with insufficient vaccination coverage. WHO guidelines now recommend outbreak response immunisation (ORI) for controlling measles outbreaks in certain contexts. The objective of this study was to describe late and early response vaccination activities during two consecutive measles outbreaks that occurred in 2005 and 2010 in N'Djamena, Chad. Using Lot Quality Assurance Sampling, vaccination coverage was estimated to be low before the interventions. Following mass vaccination campaigns, measles cases declined. The timeliness and quality of ORI activities are crucial determinants of success. However, effective outbreak response should be accompanied by strong routine vaccination programmes to ensure sustainable high vaccination coverage.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Despite impressive gains in measles control globally, measles epidemics continue to occur in countries with insufficient vaccination coverage. WHO guidelines now recommend outbreak response immunisation (ORI) for controlling measles outbreaks in certain contexts. The objective of this study was to describe late and early response vaccination activities during two consecutive measles outbreaks that occurred in 2005 and 2010 in N'Djamena, Chad. Using Lot Quality Assurance Sampling, vaccination coverage was estimated to be low before the interventions. Following mass vaccination campaigns, measles cases declined. The timeliness and quality of ORI activities are crucial determinants of success. However, effective outbreak response should be accompanied by strong routine vaccination programmes to ensure sustainable high vaccination coverage.

Key concepts: Measles, Vaccination, Outbreak, Medicine, Environmental health, Mass vaccination, Measles vaccine, Psychological intervention

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Outbreak response immunisation: the experience of Chad during recurrent measles epidemics in 2005 and 2010 — Research Paper | ScholarLens