1975Clinical PediatricsRequires access

Clinical Review: The Reading Miscue Inventory

Christopher J. Ramig

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Reading Miscue Inventory--RMI--opens avenues of dealing with the reading process in a scientific and process-oriented fashion which can lead to further refining of the theoretical base upon which reading is founded as well as providing diagnostic information for use by reading specialists. From such information, reading specialists are able to develop remediation on an individualized basis. Appropriate materials, procedures, and practices are developed from the qualitative analysis of miscues rather than from the information provided by standardized achievement or diagnostic reading tests. In sights are gained regarding a child's ability to use the complex process of reading. Remediation of disability, at the appropriate place in the process, is based on assumptions regarding the interrelationship of thought and language. Reading specialists are looking to psycholinguists for theoretical bases upon which to build models of the reading process. Qualitative miscue analysis is based upon recently proposed notions of the psycholinguistic nature of reading. Common concepts and understanding regarding reading and assessment of reading disability may facilitate learning disability teams in their diagnostic and remedial procedures. Until recently, these discussions have occurred mainly in reading-related research and in education circles, but learing disabilities teams are beginning to participate in the refining and clarifying of these notions of assessment and remediation. Regardless of the eventual outcome, the necessity for considering these views is basic to a fuller understanding of ways in which learning-disabled children may be helped.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Reading Miscue Inventory--RMI--opens avenues of dealing with the reading process in a scientific and process-oriented fashion which can lead to further refining of the theoretical base upon which reading is founded as well as providing diagnostic information for use by reading specialists. From such information, reading specialists are able to develop remediation on an individualized basis. Appropriate materials, procedures, and practices are developed from the qualitative analysis of miscues rather than from the information provided by standardized achievement or diagnostic reading tests. In sights are gained regarding a child's ability to use the complex process of reading. Remediation of disability, at the appropriate place in the process, is based on assumptions regarding the interrelationship of thought and language. Reading specialists are looking to psycholinguists for theoretical bases upon which to build models of the reading process. Qualitative miscue analysis is based upon recently proposed notions of the psycholinguistic nature of reading. Common concepts and understanding regarding reading and assessment of reading disability may facilitate learning disability teams in their diagnostic and remedial procedures. Until recently, these discussions have occurred mainly in reading-related research and in education circles, but learing disabilities teams are beginning to participate in the refining and clarifying of these notions of assessment and remediation. Regardless of the eventual outcome, the necessity for considering these views is basic to a fuller understanding of ways in which learning-disabled children may be helped.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Reading Miscue Inventory--RMI--opens avenues of dealing with the reading process in a scientific and process-oriented fashion which can lead to further refining of the theoretical base upon which reading is founded as well as providing diagnostic information for use by reading specialists. From such information, reading specialists are able to develop remediation on an individualized basis. Appropriate materials, procedures, and practices are developed from the qualitative analysis of miscues rather than from the information provided by standardized achievement or diagnostic reading tests. In sights are gained regarding a child's ability to use the complex process of reading. Remediation of disability, at the appropriate place in the process, is based on assumptions regarding the interrelationship of thought and language. Reading specialists are looking to psycholinguists for theoretical bases upon which to build models of the reading process. Qualitative miscue analysis is based upon recently proposed notions of the psycholinguistic nature of reading. Common concepts and understanding regarding reading and assessment of reading disability may facilitate learning disability teams in their diagnostic and remedial procedures. Until recently, these discussions have occurred mainly in reading-related research and in education circles, but learing disabilities teams are beginning to participate in the refining and clarifying of these notions of assessment and remediation. Regardless of the eventual outcome, the necessity for considering these views is basic to a fuller understanding of ways in which learning-disabled children may be helped.

Key concepts: Miscue analysis, Reading (process), Remedial education, Process (computing), Reading disability, Standardization, Psychology, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical Review: The Reading Miscue Inventory — Research Paper | ScholarLens