2012Arbitration InternationalRequires access

Perspectives on Three Recent Annulment Decisions from Spain: Is Where You Stand Determined by Where You Sit?

Clifford J. Hendel

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The effect of certain recent Spanish court decisions annulling arbitral awards in high-profile cases will be a subject of intense debate in Spanish legal circles. How the cases are viewed and understood by the Spanish arbitral community could have a significant effect on the development of arbitration in the country, jump-started by a 2003 UNCITRAL-based arbitration law and a series of amendments promulgated in mid-2011. Two very contrasting views are emerging: Some will see the cases as favouring the development of arbitration in Spain by setting down useful guidance as to arbitrator and counsel conduct; others will see view them as constituting unwarranted judicial meddling and thus as damaging to the development of arbitration in the country. This article frames the issues and sets out the two diverging views on the topic.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The effect of certain recent Spanish court decisions annulling arbitral awards in high-profile cases will be a subject of intense debate in Spanish legal circles. How the cases are viewed and understood by the Spanish arbitral community could have a significant effect on the development of arbitration in the country, jump-started by a 2003 UNCITRAL-based arbitration law and a series of amendments promulgated in mid-2011. Two very contrasting views are emerging: Some will see the cases as favouring the development of arbitration in Spain by setting down useful guidance as to arbitrator and counsel conduct; others will see view them as constituting unwarranted judicial meddling and thus as damaging to the development of arbitration in the country. This article frames the issues and sets out the two diverging views on the topic.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The effect of certain recent Spanish court decisions annulling arbitral awards in high-profile cases will be a subject of intense debate in Spanish legal circles. How the cases are viewed and understood by the Spanish arbitral community could have a significant effect on the development of arbitration in the country, jump-started by a 2003 UNCITRAL-based arbitration law and a series of amendments promulgated in mid-2011. Two very contrasting views are emerging: Some will see the cases as favouring the development of arbitration in Spain by setting down useful guidance as to arbitrator and counsel conduct; others will see view them as constituting unwarranted judicial meddling and thus as damaging to the development of arbitration in the country. This article frames the issues and sets out the two diverging views on the topic.

Key concepts: Annulment, Arbitration, Law, Subject (documents), Political science, Compulsory arbitration, Sociology, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Perspectives on Three Recent Annulment Decisions from Spain: Is Where You Stand Determined by Where You Sit? — Research Paper | ScholarLens