2007HIV Clinical TrialsOpen access

Evaluation of Stool Frequency and Stool Form as Measures of HIV-Related Diarrhea

Jill Tinmouth, George Tomlinson, Gabor Kandel, Sharon Walmsley, Hillary Steinhart, Richard H. Glazier

Open full text 11 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: In the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) era, HIV-related diarrhea remains common. Our aim was to evaluate stool frequency and form as measures of HIV-related diarrhea. METHOD: Forty-eight HIV-infected persons with self-reported diarrhea were studied. In Analysis 1, self-reported retrospective and 7-day prospective measurement of stool frequency and form were compared using Spearman's correlation coefficient. In Analysis 2, diarrhea was measured during two 8-hour study periods in a subgroup (n = 20) using stool weight (Wt), diarrhea symptom score (Sx Score), stool frequency (SP-freq), and stool form using the Bristol Stool Form Scale (SP-BSFS). SP-freq and SP-BSFS were modeled alone and in combination to predict Wt and Sx Score. RESULTS: In Analysis 1, correlation between measures of stool frequency was rs = 0.62 (p < .0001) but was rs = 0.16 (p = .26) between measures of stool form. In Analysis 2, the two-predictor model best predicted Wt, whereas the model using SP-freq only performed as well as the two-predictor model to predict Sx Score. CONCLUSION: Prospective measurement of stool frequency performed well; in some situations, it may be used alone to measure severity of HIV-related diarrhea. Our findings may be used to design more rigorous clinical trials in HIV.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: In the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) era, HIV-related diarrhea remains common. Our aim was to evaluate stool frequency and form as measures of HIV-related diarrhea. METHOD: Forty-eight HIV-infected persons with self-reported diarrhea were studied. In Analysis 1, self-reported retrospective and 7-day prospective measurement of stool frequency and form were compared using Spearman's correlation coefficient. In Analysis 2, diarrhea was measured during two 8-hour study periods in a subgroup (n = 20) using stool weight (Wt), diarrhea symptom score (Sx Score), stool frequency (SP-freq), and stool form using the Bristol Stool Form Scale (SP-BSFS). SP-freq and SP-BSFS were modeled alone and in combination to predict Wt and Sx Score. RESULTS: In Analysis 1, correlation between measures of stool frequency was rs = 0.62 (p < .0001) but was rs = 0.16 (p = .26) between measures of stool form. In Analysis 2, the two-predictor model best predicted Wt, whereas the model using SP-freq only performed as well as the two-predictor model to predict Sx Score. CONCLUSION: Prospective measurement of stool frequency performed well; in some situations, it may be used alone to measure severity of HIV-related diarrhea. Our findings may be used to design more rigorous clinical trials in HIV.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: In the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) era, HIV-related diarrhea remains common. Our aim was to evaluate stool frequency and form as measures of HIV-related diarrhea. METHOD: Forty-eight HIV-infected persons with self-reported diarrhea were studied. In Analysis 1, self-reported retrospective and 7-day prospective measurement of stool frequency and form were compared using Spearman's correlation coefficient. In Analysis 2, diarrhea was measured during two 8-hour study periods in a subgroup (n = 20) using stool weight (Wt), diarrhea symptom score (Sx Score), stool frequency (SP-freq), and stool form using the Bristol Stool Form Scale (SP-BSFS). SP-freq and SP-BSFS were modeled alone and in combination to predict Wt and Sx Score. RESULTS: In Analysis 1, correlation between measures of stool frequency was rs = 0.62 (p < .0001) but was rs = 0.16 (p = .26) between measures of stool form. In Analysis 2, the two-predictor model best predicted Wt, whereas the model using SP-freq only performed as well as the two-predictor model to predict Sx Score. CONCLUSION: Prospective measurement of stool frequency performed well; in some situations, it may be used alone to measure severity of HIV-related diarrhea. Our findings may be used to design more rigorous clinical trials in HIV.

Key concepts: Diarrhea, Medicine, Internal medicine, Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Gastroenterology, Prospective cohort study, Antiretroviral therapy, Correlation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Stool Frequency and Stool Form as Measures of HIV-Related Diarrhea — Research Paper | ScholarLens