1992Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations of CrystallographyRequires access

Bragg-surface three-beam dynamical X-ray diffraction

Cheng‐Kui Jen, S.-L. Chang

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

Three-beam diffraction with a symmetric Bragg reflection and a surface diffraction is studied based on the dynamical theory of X-ray diffraction. The difficulty involved in the boundary conditions for the surface diffraction is overcome by treating the Bragg–surface diffraction as either a Bragg–Laue or a Bragg–Bragg case with the inclination angle α between the crystal surface and the surface-diffracted beam being very small, about 10−5 rad. The geometry of the dispersion surface, the number of permitted modes of wave propagation, the linear absorption coefficient, the excitation of the beam and the diffracted intensity are calculated for the Ge (000) (222) (31\overline 1) Bragg–surface diffraction of Cu Kα1. It is found that the calculated relative integrated intensity ratio among the Bragg–surface 31\overline 1 case and the Bragg–Bragg 113 and 51\overline 1 cases is in good agreement with the integrated intensity ratio obtained experimentally.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Three-beam diffraction with a symmetric Bragg reflection and a surface diffraction is studied based on the dynamical theory of X-ray diffraction. The difficulty involved in the boundary conditions for the surface diffraction is overcome by treating the Bragg–surface diffraction as either a Bragg–Laue or a Bragg–Bragg case with the inclination angle α between the crystal surface and the surface-diffracted beam being very small, about 10−5 rad. The geometry of the dispersion surface, the number of permitted modes of wave propagation, the linear absorption coefficient, the excitation of the beam and the diffracted intensity are calculated for the Ge (000) (222) (31\overline 1) Bragg–surface diffraction of Cu Kα1. It is found that the calculated relative integrated intensity ratio among the Bragg–surface 31\overline 1 case and the Bragg–Bragg 113 and 51\overline 1 cases is in good agreement with the integrated intensity ratio obtained experimentally.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Three-beam diffraction with a symmetric Bragg reflection and a surface diffraction is studied based on the dynamical theory of X-ray diffraction. The difficulty involved in the boundary conditions for the surface diffraction is overcome by treating the Bragg–surface diffraction as either a Bragg–Laue or a Bragg–Bragg case with the inclination angle α between the crystal surface and the surface-diffracted beam being very small, about 10−5 rad. The geometry of the dispersion surface, the number of permitted modes of wave propagation, the linear absorption coefficient, the excitation of the beam and the diffracted intensity are calculated for the Ge (000) (222) (31\overline 1) Bragg–surface diffraction of Cu Kα1. It is found that the calculated relative integrated intensity ratio among the Bragg–surface 31\overline 1 case and the Bragg–Bragg 113 and 51\overline 1 cases is in good agreement with the integrated intensity ratio obtained experimentally.

Key concepts: Diffraction topography, Bragg's law, Diffraction, Optics, Acousto-optics, Bragg peak, Beam (structure), Dynamical theory of diffraction

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bragg-surface three-beam dynamical X-ray diffraction — Research Paper | ScholarLens