1996•Economy and SocietyRequires access

Governing love: on the tactical control of countertransference in the psychoanalytic community

Tim Kendall, Nick Crossley

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

This paper interrogtes the poroblematics of ‘love’ as they relate to psychoanalysis. We have restricted our investigation to psychonalytic texts which address the ‘theory of practices’ as the ideal to which pratice aspires. ‘Loves’ in psychoanalysis acts as a focus for pracices of incitmen and regulation. The psyhoanalytic setting and method incites (transferences) ‘love’ in the patient and (countertransference) ‘love’ in the analyst, feelings which are the subjected to a variety of govermenal procedures so as transform abnormal ‘love’into healthier ‘love’. The power relatios ad modes of governmen in this srategic process are analysed. It is our contetion that psychoanlytic commuity treats ‘love’ as a contagion from which it has attempted to immunize itself through the tactiical control of countertransference. Therapy, seen in this way, is precisely a form of government of self and other.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper interrogtes the poroblematics of ‘love’ as they relate to psychoanalysis. We have restricted our investigation to psychonalytic texts which address the ‘theory of practices’ as the ideal to which pratice aspires. ‘Loves’ in psychoanalysis acts as a focus for pracices of incitmen and regulation. The psyhoanalytic setting and method incites (transferences) ‘love’ in the patient and (countertransference) ‘love’ in the analyst, feelings which are the subjected to a variety of govermenal procedures so as transform abnormal ‘love’into healthier ‘love’. The power relatios ad modes of governmen in this srategic process are analysed. It is our contetion that psychoanlytic commuity treats ‘love’ as a contagion from which it has attempted to immunize itself through the tactiical control of countertransference. Therapy, seen in this way, is precisely a form of government of self and other.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper interrogtes the poroblematics of ‘love’ as they relate to psychoanalysis. We have restricted our investigation to psychonalytic texts which address the ‘theory of practices’ as the ideal to which pratice aspires. ‘Loves’ in psychoanalysis acts as a focus for pracices of incitmen and regulation. The psyhoanalytic setting and method incites (transferences) ‘love’ in the patient and (countertransference) ‘love’ in the analyst, feelings which are the subjected to a variety of govermenal procedures so as transform abnormal ‘love’into healthier ‘love’. The power relatios ad modes of governmen in this srategic process are analysed. It is our contetion that psychoanlytic commuity treats ‘love’ as a contagion from which it has attempted to immunize itself through the tactiical control of countertransference. Therapy, seen in this way, is precisely a form of government of self and other.

Key concepts: Countertransference, Feeling, Psychoanalytic theory, Psychoanalysis, Variety (cybernetics), Psychology, Power (physics), Psychotherapist

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Governing love: on the tactical control of countertransference in the psychoanalytic community — Research Paper | ScholarLens