Comparison of Proximal Fusion to T1 or T2 in Double Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Jin-Hyok Kim, Se-Il Suk, Sung-Soo Kim
Abstract
Jin-Hyok Kim, Se-Il Suk, Sung-Soo Kim
Abstract
Purpose : To assess the results of double thoracic fusion using pedicle screw instrumentation fused proximally to T1 or T2 in patients with double thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Materials and Methods : Forty patients with double thoracic AIS were analyzed retrospectively after a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The patients were divided into two groups according to the proximal fusion level: the T1 group (n=26) was fused to T1 and the T2 group (n=14) was fused to T2. Results : There were no significant differences in the preoperative curve characteristics between the two groups. In the T1 group, the preoperative upper curve magnitude of 38±7˚ and apical vertebral translation (AVT) of 8±6 mm were corrected to 17±7˚ (54% correction) and 4±3 mm (3 mm correction) at the final follow-up, respectively. In the T2 group, the preoperative upper curve magnitude of 37±5˚ and the AVT of 7±4 mm were corrected to 22±6˚ (42% correction) and 6±3 mm (1 mm correction) at the final follow-up, respectively. There was no difference in the correction of lower thoracic curve, sagittal alignment and balance between the two groups. There was a significantly better correction in the upper thoracic curve and T1 tilting in the T1 group than the the T2 group. Conclusion : In double thoracic AIS, fusions to T1 and T2 produce satisfactory results. However, fusion to T1 is recommended for a better correction of the upper curve and T1 tilting.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Purpose : To assess the results of double thoracic fusion using pedicle screw instrumentation fused proximally to T1 or T2 in patients with double thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Materials and Methods : Forty patients with double thoracic AIS were analyzed retrospectively after a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The patients were divided into two groups according to the proximal fusion level: the T1 group (n=26) was fused to T1 and the T2 group (n=14) was fused to T2. Results : There were no significant differences in the preoperative curve characteristics between the two groups. In the T1 group, the preoperative upper curve magnitude of 38±7˚ and apical vertebral translation (AVT) of 8±6 mm were corrected to 17±7˚ (54% correction) and 4±3 mm (3 mm correction) at the final follow-up, respectively. In the T2 group, the preoperative upper curve magnitude of 37±5˚ and the AVT of 7±4 mm were corrected to 22±6˚ (42% correction) and 6±3 mm (1 mm correction) at the final follow-up, respectively. There was no difference in the correction of lower thoracic curve, sagittal alignment and balance between the two groups. There was a significantly better correction in the upper thoracic curve and T1 tilting in the T1 group than the the T2 group. Conclusion : In double thoracic AIS, fusions to T1 and T2 produce satisfactory results. However, fusion to T1 is recommended for a better correction of the upper curve and T1 tilting.
Key concepts: Medicine, Idiopathic scoliosis, Sagittal plane, Nuclear medicine, Spinal fusion, Coronal plane, Scoliosis, Surgery