1992British Journal of DermatologyRequires access

Serological diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid (BP): comparison of the sensitivity of indirect immunofluorescence on salt-split to immunoblotting

Paulo Machado, HELENE MICHALAKI, P. Roche, M Gaucherand, J Thivolet, Jean‐François Nicolas

Open publisher page 31 citations

Abstract

Specialized immunological assays are required for the accurate diagnosis of bullous dermatoses such as bullous pemphigoid (BP), epidermolysis bullosa acquisita and bullous lupus erythematosus. The aim of this study was to analyse and compare the sensitivity of indirect immunofluorescence (IF) on salt-split skin and immunoblotting for the detection of circulating autoantibodies in BP. Of the BP patients selected for the study, 74/79 (94%) had circulating autoantibodies detected by at least one of the two methods. Both methods had comparable sensitivity and detected BP-specific autoantibodies in 82-85% of the patients. Because 20% of the patients were found to be positive by only one of the methods, both methods should be used in the diagnosis of BP. Indirect IF on salt-split skin is easier to perform and is preferable in routine analysis, but Western blotting may be used as a complementary assay with sera showing no reactivity on salt-split skin.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Specialized immunological assays are required for the accurate diagnosis of bullous dermatoses such as bullous pemphigoid (BP), epidermolysis bullosa acquisita and bullous lupus erythematosus. The aim of this study was to analyse and compare the sensitivity of indirect immunofluorescence (IF) on salt-split skin and immunoblotting for the detection of circulating autoantibodies in BP. Of the BP patients selected for the study, 74/79 (94%) had circulating autoantibodies detected by at least one of the two methods. Both methods had comparable sensitivity and detected BP-specific autoantibodies in 82-85% of the patients. Because 20% of the patients were found to be positive by only one of the methods, both methods should be used in the diagnosis of BP. Indirect IF on salt-split skin is easier to perform and is preferable in routine analysis, but Western blotting may be used as a complementary assay with sera showing no reactivity on salt-split skin.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 31 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Specialized immunological assays are required for the accurate diagnosis of bullous dermatoses such as bullous pemphigoid (BP), epidermolysis bullosa acquisita and bullous lupus erythematosus. The aim of this study was to analyse and compare the sensitivity of indirect immunofluorescence (IF) on salt-split skin and immunoblotting for the detection of circulating autoantibodies in BP. Of the BP patients selected for the study, 74/79 (94%) had circulating autoantibodies detected by at least one of the two methods. Both methods had comparable sensitivity and detected BP-specific autoantibodies in 82-85% of the patients. Because 20% of the patients were found to be positive by only one of the methods, both methods should be used in the diagnosis of BP. Indirect IF on salt-split skin is easier to perform and is preferable in routine analysis, but Western blotting may be used as a complementary assay with sera showing no reactivity on salt-split skin.

Key concepts: Bullous pemphigoid, Indirect immunofluorescence, Immunofluorescence, Serology, Medicine, Pemphigoid, Dermatology, Direct fluorescent antibody

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Serological diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid (BP): comparison of the sensitivity of indirect immunofluorescence on salt-split to immunoblotting — Research Paper | ScholarLens