2010•Mathematical Thinking and LearningRequires access

Cognitive and Metacognitive Aspects of Proportional Reasoning

Modestina Modestou, Athanasios Gagatsis

Open publisher page 59 citations

Abstract

In this study we attempt to propose a new model of proportional reasoning based both on bibliographical and research data. This is impelled with the help of three written tests involving analogical, proportional, and non-proportional situations that were administered to pupils from grade 7 to 9. The results suggest the existence of a multi-component model of proportional reasoning, contributing in this way to the reformulation of the concept. In this model, the components of analogical reasoning, routine proportionality, and meta-analogical awareness take a constitutive part. Thus, proportional reasoning does not coincide exclusively with success in solving a certain restricted range of proportional problems, as routine missing-value and comparison problems (routine proportionality), but it also involves handling verbal and arithmetical analogies (analogical reasoning) as well as the awareness of discerning non-proportional situations (meta-analogical awareness), which is metacognitive in nature.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this study we attempt to propose a new model of proportional reasoning based both on bibliographical and research data. This is impelled with the help of three written tests involving analogical, proportional, and non-proportional situations that were administered to pupils from grade 7 to 9. The results suggest the existence of a multi-component model of proportional reasoning, contributing in this way to the reformulation of the concept. In this model, the components of analogical reasoning, routine proportionality, and meta-analogical awareness take a constitutive part. Thus, proportional reasoning does not coincide exclusively with success in solving a certain restricted range of proportional problems, as routine missing-value and comparison problems (routine proportionality), but it also involves handling verbal and arithmetical analogies (analogical reasoning) as well as the awareness of discerning non-proportional situations (meta-analogical awareness), which is metacognitive in nature.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 59 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this study we attempt to propose a new model of proportional reasoning based both on bibliographical and research data. This is impelled with the help of three written tests involving analogical, proportional, and non-proportional situations that were administered to pupils from grade 7 to 9. The results suggest the existence of a multi-component model of proportional reasoning, contributing in this way to the reformulation of the concept. In this model, the components of analogical reasoning, routine proportionality, and meta-analogical awareness take a constitutive part. Thus, proportional reasoning does not coincide exclusively with success in solving a certain restricted range of proportional problems, as routine missing-value and comparison problems (routine proportionality), but it also involves handling verbal and arithmetical analogies (analogical reasoning) as well as the awareness of discerning non-proportional situations (meta-analogical awareness), which is metacognitive in nature.

Key concepts: Proportional reasoning, Metacognition, Analogical reasoning, Cognition, Proportionality (law), Verbal reasoning, Psychology, Cognitive psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source