ScholarLens Back to search
2006•Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyOpen access

Four different study designs to evaluate vaccine safety were equally validated with contrasting limitations

Jason M. Glanz, David L. McClure, Shenglin Xu, Simon J. Hambidge, Moo Hyun Lee, MARGARETTE S. KOLCZAK, Ken Kleinman, John P. Mullooly, Eric K. France

Open full text 121 citations

Abstract

This record does not include an abstract. Use the full-text link above if available.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An abstract is not available in the OpenAlex record for this paper.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 121 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Key concepts: Confounding, Medicine, Cohort, Confidence interval, Statistics, Cohort study, Incidence (geometry), Rate ratio

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Four different study designs to evaluate vaccine safety were equally validated with contrasting limitations — Research Paper | ScholarLens