Mass function and bias of dark matter halos for non-Gaussian initial conditions
Patrick Valageas
Abstract
Open-access reader
Patrick Valageas
Abstract
Open-access reader
Aims. We revisit the derivation of the mass function and the bias of dark matter halos for non-Gaussian initial conditions.Methods. We use a steepest-descent approach to point out that exact results can be obtained for the high-mass tail of the halo mass function and the two-point correlation of massive halos. Focusing on primordial non-Gaussianity of the local type, we check that these results agree with numerical simulations.Results. The high-mass cutoff of the halo mass function takes the same form as the one obtained from the Press-Schechter formalism, but with a linear threshold δL that depends on the definition of the halo (i.e. δL 1.59 for a nonlinear density contrast of 200). We show that a simple formula, which obeys this high-mass asymptotic and uses the fit obtained for Gaussian initial conditions, matches numerical simulations while keeping the mass function normalized to unity. Next, by deriving the real-space halo two-point correlation in the spirit of Kaiser (1984, ApJ, 284, L9) and taking a Fourier transform, we obtain good agreement with simulations for the correction to the halo bias, ΔbM(k,fNL), due to primordial non-Gaussianity. Therefore, neither the halo mass function nor the bias require an ad-hoc parameter q (such as δc δc ), provided one uses the correct linear threshold δL and pays attention to halo displacements. The nonlinear real-space expression can be useful for checking that the “linearized” bias is a valid approximation. Moreover, it clearly shows how the baryon acoustic oscillation at ~100 h-1 Mpc is amplified by the bias of massive halos and modified by primordial non-Gaussianity. On smaller scales, 30 < x < 90 h-1 Mpc, the correction to the real-space bias roughly scales as fNL bM(fNL = 0) x2. The low-k behavior of the halo bias does not imply a divergent real-space correlation, so that one does not need to introduce counterterms that depend on the survey size.
OpenAlex reports 41 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Aims. We revisit the derivation of the mass function and the bias of dark matter halos for non-Gaussian initial conditions.Methods. We use a steepest-descent approach to point out that exact results can be obtained for the high-mass tail of the halo mass function and the two-point correlation of massive halos. Focusing on primordial non-Gaussianity of the local type, we check that these results agree with numerical simulations.Results. The high-mass cutoff of the halo mass function takes the same form as the one obtained from the Press-Schechter formalism, but with a linear threshold δL that depends on the definition of the halo (i.e. δL 1.59 for a nonlinear density contrast of 200). We show that a simple formula, which obeys this high-mass asymptotic and uses the fit obtained for Gaussian initial conditions, matches numerical simulations while keeping the mass function normalized to unity. Next, by deriving the real-space halo two-point correlation in the spirit of Kaiser (1984, ApJ, 284, L9) and taking a Fourier transform, we obtain good agreement with simulations for the correction to the halo bias, ΔbM(k,fNL), due to primordial non-Gaussianity. Therefore, neither the halo mass function nor the bias require an ad-hoc parameter q (such as δc δc ), provided one uses the correct linear threshold δL and pays attention to halo displacements. The nonlinear real-space expression can be useful for checking that the “linearized” bias is a valid approximation. Moreover, it clearly shows how the baryon acoustic oscillation at ~100 h-1 Mpc is amplified by the bias of massive halos and modified by primordial non-Gaussianity. On smaller scales, 30 < x < 90 h-1 Mpc, the correction to the real-space bias roughly scales as fNL bM(fNL = 0) x2. The low-k behavior of the halo bias does not imply a divergent real-space correlation, so that one does not need to introduce counterterms that depend on the survey size.
Key concepts: Halo, Halo effect, Halo mass function, Physics, Dark matter, Gaussian, Non-Gaussianity, Function (biology)