Single-Mode Panel Flutter of a Wind Tunnel Flex-Wall
L. L. Erickson, D. L. Kassner, L. R. Guist, Mladin K. Chargin
Abstract
L. L. Erickson, D. L. Kassner, L. R. Guist, Mladin K. Chargin
Abstract
Twice during the spring of 1978, the two steel-plate flex-walls that form the variable-geometry nozzle of the 11- by 11-ft transonic wind tunnel at Ames Research Center experienced a severe dynamic instability. Both walls fluttered in the fundamental beam-bending mode and experienced stresses approaching the yield strength of the material. Both flutter incidents occurred at Mach numbers of about 1.15. The tunnel, operational for 24 years, had no history of such an instability. The cause of these flutter incidents, the steps taken to prevent a recurrence, and the requalification of the facility are described.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Twice during the spring of 1978, the two steel-plate flex-walls that form the variable-geometry nozzle of the 11- by 11-ft transonic wind tunnel at Ames Research Center experienced a severe dynamic instability. Both walls fluttered in the fundamental beam-bending mode and experienced stresses approaching the yield strength of the material. Both flutter incidents occurred at Mach numbers of about 1.15. The tunnel, operational for 24 years, had no history of such an instability. The cause of these flutter incidents, the steps taken to prevent a recurrence, and the requalification of the facility are described.
Key concepts: FLEX, Flutter, Wind tunnel, Aeroelasticity, Structural engineering, Mode (computer interface), Aerodynamics, Aerospace engineering