2006•elib (German Aerospace Center)Requires access

LES AND URANS UNSTEADY BOUNDARY LAYER STRATEGIES FOR PULSATING AND OSCILLATING TURBULENT CHANNEL FLOW APPLICATIONS.

Daniele Panara, Mauro Porta, Thilo Schoenfeld, Avenue Gaspard Coriolis

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Abstract. The use of wall functions has been investigated for LES and URANS numeri-cal simulation in pulsating and oscillating channel flow applications. The results show that the wall function approach is accurate in the so called quasi-steady regime but there are discrepancy with the experimental results in the intermediate frequency range. A special attention is given to the wall-shear stress prediction, and in particular on the wall-shear stress phase shift with respect to the free stream velocity. In order to capture such un-steady flow effect, the boundary layer needs to be resolved. Different approach such as Low Reynolds Number near wall turbulence modeling (URANS) or the proposed Wall-Normal Resolved strategy (LES) seem to be suited for this purpose. The backdraw is unfortunately the increasing of computational points in the boundary layer and consequently the higher computational cost. 1

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract. The use of wall functions has been investigated for LES and URANS numeri-cal simulation in pulsating and oscillating channel flow applications. The results show that the wall function approach is accurate in the so called quasi-steady regime but there are discrepancy with the experimental results in the intermediate frequency range. A special attention is given to the wall-shear stress prediction, and in particular on the wall-shear stress phase shift with respect to the free stream velocity. In order to capture such un-steady flow effect, the boundary layer needs to be resolved. Different approach such as Low Reynolds Number near wall turbulence modeling (URANS) or the proposed Wall-Normal Resolved strategy (LES) seem to be suited for this purpose. The backdraw is unfortunately the increasing of computational points in the boundary layer and consequently the higher computational cost. 1

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract. The use of wall functions has been investigated for LES and URANS numeri-cal simulation in pulsating and oscillating channel flow applications. The results show that the wall function approach is accurate in the so called quasi-steady regime but there are discrepancy with the experimental results in the intermediate frequency range. A special attention is given to the wall-shear stress prediction, and in particular on the wall-shear stress phase shift with respect to the free stream velocity. In order to capture such un-steady flow effect, the boundary layer needs to be resolved. Different approach such as Low Reynolds Number near wall turbulence modeling (URANS) or the proposed Wall-Normal Resolved strategy (LES) seem to be suited for this purpose. The backdraw is unfortunately the increasing of computational points in the boundary layer and consequently the higher computational cost. 1

Key concepts: Turbulence, Boundary layer, Mechanics, Shear stress, Open-channel flow, Physics, Reynolds number, Flow (mathematics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
LES AND URANS UNSTEADY BOUNDARY LAYER STRATEGIES FOR PULSATING AND OSCILLATING TURBULENT CHANNEL FLOW APPLICATIONS. — Research Paper | ScholarLens