2013•Review of Development EconomicsRequires access

Trade Variety and Productivity in C anada

Bo Chen

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper combines the effects of import and export variety growth on technological development in a monopolistic competition model with endogenous technology. Using highly disaggregated international trade data at the national and provincial levels from 1988 to 2006, it is found that export variety and import variety account for 10.41% and 1.57% respectively of the variation in Canadian provincial productivity differences, and for 9.92% and 6.95% of within‐province productivity growth. Evaluated at the sample mean, Canadian productivity gained 0.74% as a result of trade variety growth: export variety contributed 0.41% and import variety contributed 0.33%. While the USA is the single most important source of export‐led Canadian productivity growth, its relative importance is much less on the import side. Emerging markets in Asia, especially China, contributed significantly to Canadian productivity growth by increasing import variety for Canadian producers.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract This paper combines the effects of import and export variety growth on technological development in a monopolistic competition model with endogenous technology. Using highly disaggregated international trade data at the national and provincial levels from 1988 to 2006, it is found that export variety and import variety account for 10.41% and 1.57% respectively of the variation in Canadian provincial productivity differences, and for 9.92% and 6.95% of within‐province productivity growth. Evaluated at the sample mean, Canadian productivity gained 0.74% as a result of trade variety growth: export variety contributed 0.41% and import variety contributed 0.33%. While the USA is the single most important source of export‐led Canadian productivity growth, its relative importance is much less on the import side. Emerging markets in Asia, especially China, contributed significantly to Canadian productivity growth by increasing import variety for Canadian producers.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract This paper combines the effects of import and export variety growth on technological development in a monopolistic competition model with endogenous technology. Using highly disaggregated international trade data at the national and provincial levels from 1988 to 2006, it is found that export variety and import variety account for 10.41% and 1.57% respectively of the variation in Canadian provincial productivity differences, and for 9.92% and 6.95% of within‐province productivity growth. Evaluated at the sample mean, Canadian productivity gained 0.74% as a result of trade variety growth: export variety contributed 0.41% and import variety contributed 0.33%. While the USA is the single most important source of export‐led Canadian productivity growth, its relative importance is much less on the import side. Emerging markets in Asia, especially China, contributed significantly to Canadian productivity growth by increasing import variety for Canadian producers.

Key concepts: Monopolistic competition, Productivity, Variety (cybernetics), Economics, International trade, Competition (biology), Total factor productivity, International economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Trade Variety and Productivity in C anada — Research Paper | ScholarLens