2005The British Journal of Social WorkRequires access

Reflexivity, its Meanings and Relevance for Social Work: A Critical Review of the Literature

Heather D’Cruz, Philip Gillingham, Sebastian Melendez

Open publisher page 534 citations

Abstract

The concept of ‘reflexivity’ has become increasingly significant in social work literature in relation to social work education, theory and practice. However, our reading of the literature indicates that there is a lack of clarity about the concept in terms of who is being exhorted to be ‘reflexive’, when and how. This article addresses these questions through a critical review of social work literature since the 1990s that discusses the concept of ‘reflexivity’. Given that many authors seem to use the concepts of ‘reflexivity’ and ‘(critical) reflection’ interchangeably, we also apply this analysis to ‘reflection’ and ‘critical reflection’. This article raises important questions about how the concepts of ‘reflexivity’, ‘critical reflection’ and ‘reflectivity’ are defined and the different consequences such definitions might have for social work education, theory and practice.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The concept of ‘reflexivity’ has become increasingly significant in social work literature in relation to social work education, theory and practice. However, our reading of the literature indicates that there is a lack of clarity about the concept in terms of who is being exhorted to be ‘reflexive’, when and how. This article addresses these questions through a critical review of social work literature since the 1990s that discusses the concept of ‘reflexivity’. Given that many authors seem to use the concepts of ‘reflexivity’ and ‘(critical) reflection’ interchangeably, we also apply this analysis to ‘reflection’ and ‘critical reflection’. This article raises important questions about how the concepts of ‘reflexivity’, ‘critical reflection’ and ‘reflectivity’ are defined and the different consequences such definitions might have for social work education, theory and practice.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 534 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The concept of ‘reflexivity’ has become increasingly significant in social work literature in relation to social work education, theory and practice. However, our reading of the literature indicates that there is a lack of clarity about the concept in terms of who is being exhorted to be ‘reflexive’, when and how. This article addresses these questions through a critical review of social work literature since the 1990s that discusses the concept of ‘reflexivity’. Given that many authors seem to use the concepts of ‘reflexivity’ and ‘(critical) reflection’ interchangeably, we also apply this analysis to ‘reflection’ and ‘critical reflection’. This article raises important questions about how the concepts of ‘reflexivity’, ‘critical reflection’ and ‘reflectivity’ are defined and the different consequences such definitions might have for social work education, theory and practice.

Key concepts: Relevance (law), Reflexivity, Sociology, Media studies, History, Social science, Political science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reflexivity, its Meanings and Relevance for Social Work: A Critical Review of the Literature — Research Paper | ScholarLens