Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues
Stein Dankert Kolstø
Abstract
Stein Dankert Kolstø
Abstract
Abstract This article offers a general framework for examining the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Eight specific content‐transcending topics to be emphasized in science education are proposed. The topics are grouped under the headings science as a social process, limitations of science, values in science, and critical attitude. Each topic is explored, and it is argued that knowledge of the topics can serve as tools for students' examination of science‐related claims in controversial socioscientific issues. The underlying perspective here is empowerment and the needs of students as lay people. The need of society as a whole for decisions to be made on a broad and firm basis is nevertheless also included. The main reason for suggesting the eight content‐transcending topics is to provide focal points for the future development of teaching models aimed at science education for citizenship. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Sci Ed 85:291–310, 2001.
OpenAlex reports 808 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract This article offers a general framework for examining the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Eight specific content‐transcending topics to be emphasized in science education are proposed. The topics are grouped under the headings science as a social process, limitations of science, values in science, and critical attitude. Each topic is explored, and it is argued that knowledge of the topics can serve as tools for students' examination of science‐related claims in controversial socioscientific issues. The underlying perspective here is empowerment and the needs of students as lay people. The need of society as a whole for decisions to be made on a broad and firm basis is nevertheless also included. The main reason for suggesting the eight content‐transcending topics is to provide focal points for the future development of teaching models aimed at science education for citizenship. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Sci Ed 85:291–310, 2001.
Key concepts: Scientific literacy, Science education, Citizenship, Science, technology, society and environment education, Sociology, Social science education, Dimension (graph theory), Nature of Science