2001•NeoReviewsRequires access

The Small-for-Gestational Age Infant

Patti J. Thureen, Marianne S. Anderson, William W. Hay

Open publisher page 48 citations

Abstract

After completing this article, readers should be able to: 1. Compare and contrast symmetric and asymmetric growth in small-for-gestational age (SGA) infants. 2. Describe common physical characteristics of the SGA infant. 3. Describe common problems encountered in SGA infants and their management. 4. Characterize postnatal growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes of SGA infants. More than 50 years ago, pediatricians and early “neonatologists” observed that newborns who had birthweights that were statistically less than the 10th percentile or 2 standard deviations below the mean weight for their gestational age experienced unique medical problems. These infants, termed small for gestational age (SGA), had more frequent problems with perinatal depression (“asphyxia”), hypothermia, hypoglycemia, polycythemia, long-term deficits in growth, and neurodevelopmental handicaps and higher rates of fetal and neonatal mortality (Fig. 1⇓ ). Despite improvements in perinatal diagnosis and treatment, SGA infants are still born regularly (more frequently in underdeveloped countries, but also in the United States and other developed areas), and their perinatal morbidity and mortality rates continue to exceed those of normal fetuses and infants. Figure 1. Morbidities specific to SGA infants. Adapted from Lubchenco LO. The High Risk Infant . Vol. XIV. In: Schaffer AJ, Markowitz M, eds. Major Problems in Clinical Pediatrics . Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1976. As the specific morbidities associated with SGA infants were recognized, relatively standardized approaches to their evaluation and clinical management were established. However, there always have been conflicting data in the literature regarding differences between SGA and appropriate-for-gestational age (AGA) infants in areas such as long-term outcome, nutrient metabolism, and growth potential. Recent literature suggest that adults who experienced severe growth restriction in utero have a significantly increased incidence of hypertension, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes. Additionally, new evidence suggests that untoward metabolic events in utero that produce fetal growth restriction also may produce lifelong alterations in growth …

About this research paper

What this paper is about

After completing this article, readers should be able to: 1. Compare and contrast symmetric and asymmetric growth in small-for-gestational age (SGA) infants. 2. Describe common physical characteristics of the SGA infant. 3. Describe common problems encountered in SGA infants and their management. 4. Characterize postnatal growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes of SGA infants. More than 50 years ago, pediatricians and early “neonatologists” observed that newborns who had birthweights that were statistically less than the 10th percentile or 2 standard deviations below the mean weight for their gestational age experienced unique medical problems. These infants, termed small for gestational age (SGA), had more frequent problems with perinatal depression (“asphyxia”), hypothermia, hypoglycemia, polycythemia, long-term deficits in growth, and neurodevelopmental handicaps and higher rates of fetal and neonatal mortality (Fig. 1⇓ ). Despite improvements in perinatal diagnosis and treatment, SGA infants are still born regularly (more frequently in underdeveloped countries, but also in the United States and other developed areas), and their perinatal morbidity and mortality rates continue to exceed those of normal fetuses and infants. Figure 1. Morbidities specific to SGA infants. Adapted from Lubchenco LO. The High Risk Infant . Vol. XIV. In: Schaffer AJ, Markowitz M, eds. Major Problems in Clinical Pediatrics . Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1976. As the specific morbidities associated with SGA infants were recognized, relatively standardized approaches to their evaluation and clinical management were established. However, there always have been conflicting data in the literature regarding differences between SGA and appropriate-for-gestational age (AGA) infants in areas such as long-term outcome, nutrient metabolism, and growth potential. Recent literature suggest that adults who experienced severe growth restriction in utero have a significantly increased incidence of hypertension, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes. Additionally, new evidence suggests that untoward metabolic events in utero that produce fetal growth restriction also may produce lifelong alterations in growth …

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 48 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

After completing this article, readers should be able to: 1. Compare and contrast symmetric and asymmetric growth in small-for-gestational age (SGA) infants. 2. Describe common physical characteristics of the SGA infant. 3. Describe common problems encountered in SGA infants and their management. 4. Characterize postnatal growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes of SGA infants. More than 50 years ago, pediatricians and early “neonatologists” observed that newborns who had birthweights that were statistically less than the 10th percentile or 2 standard deviations below the mean weight for their gestational age experienced unique medical problems. These infants, termed small for gestational age (SGA), had more frequent problems with perinatal depression (“asphyxia”), hypothermia, hypoglycemia, polycythemia, long-term deficits in growth, and neurodevelopmental handicaps and higher rates of fetal and neonatal mortality (Fig. 1⇓ ). Despite improvements in perinatal diagnosis and treatment, SGA infants are still born regularly (more frequently in underdeveloped countries, but also in the United States and other developed areas), and their perinatal morbidity and mortality rates continue to exceed those of normal fetuses and infants. Figure 1. Morbidities specific to SGA infants. Adapted from Lubchenco LO. The High Risk Infant . Vol. XIV. In: Schaffer AJ, Markowitz M, eds. Major Problems in Clinical Pediatrics . Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1976. As the specific morbidities associated with SGA infants were recognized, relatively standardized approaches to their evaluation and clinical management were established. However, there always have been conflicting data in the literature regarding differences between SGA and appropriate-for-gestational age (AGA) infants in areas such as long-term outcome, nutrient metabolism, and growth potential. Recent literature suggest that adults who experienced severe growth restriction in utero have a significantly increased incidence of hypertension, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes. Additionally, new evidence suggests that untoward metabolic events in utero that produce fetal growth restriction also may produce lifelong alterations in growth …

Key concepts: Medicine, Small for gestational age, Gestational age, Obstetrics, Pediatrics, Pregnancy, Biology, Genetics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Small-for-Gestational Age Infant — Research Paper | ScholarLens