1996•Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesRequires access

Phylogenetic uncertainties and sensitivity analyses in comparative biology

Michael J. Donoghue, David D. Ackerly

Open publisher page 146 citations

Abstract

Abstract Phylogenetic comparative analyses combine information on character states and phylogenetic relationships of taxa to test hypotheses regarding character evolution. These studies encounter uncertainties at various steps, including uncertainty in the topology of phylogenetic trees, the scoring of characters, and the addition of taxa that have not explicitly been included in phylogenetic analyses. Here we highlight a variety of sensitivity tests designed to explore the robustness of comparative conclusions to changes in underlying assumptions. These include the examination of character correlations on a set of plausible phylogenetic hypotheses (including alternative rootings and ‘neighbouring’ trees), as well as under alternative character codings. TreeBASE -a prototype relational database of phylogenetic data - should prove useful in accessing alternative hypotheses.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Phylogenetic comparative analyses combine information on character states and phylogenetic relationships of taxa to test hypotheses regarding character evolution. These studies encounter uncertainties at various steps, including uncertainty in the topology of phylogenetic trees, the scoring of characters, and the addition of taxa that have not explicitly been included in phylogenetic analyses. Here we highlight a variety of sensitivity tests designed to explore the robustness of comparative conclusions to changes in underlying assumptions. These include the examination of character correlations on a set of plausible phylogenetic hypotheses (including alternative rootings and ‘neighbouring’ trees), as well as under alternative character codings. TreeBASE -a prototype relational database of phylogenetic data - should prove useful in accessing alternative hypotheses.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 146 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Phylogenetic comparative analyses combine information on character states and phylogenetic relationships of taxa to test hypotheses regarding character evolution. These studies encounter uncertainties at various steps, including uncertainty in the topology of phylogenetic trees, the scoring of characters, and the addition of taxa that have not explicitly been included in phylogenetic analyses. Here we highlight a variety of sensitivity tests designed to explore the robustness of comparative conclusions to changes in underlying assumptions. These include the examination of character correlations on a set of plausible phylogenetic hypotheses (including alternative rootings and ‘neighbouring’ trees), as well as under alternative character codings. TreeBASE -a prototype relational database of phylogenetic data - should prove useful in accessing alternative hypotheses.

Key concepts: Phylogenetic tree, Phylogenetic comparative methods, Character (mathematics), Taxon, Biology, Phylogenetics, Robustness (evolution), Character evolution

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Phylogenetic uncertainties and sensitivity analyses in comparative biology — Research Paper | ScholarLens