ROADSIDE SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE EVALUATION PROGRAM: TECHNICAL REPORT
Jett McFalls, Ming‐Han Li, Aditya B Raut Desai
Abstract
Jett McFalls, Ming‐Han Li, Aditya B Raut Desai
Abstract
One of the problems facing designers/engineers in maintaining regulatory compliance with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) is the lack of quantifiable data to assist in selecting effective sediment control best management practices (BMPs). Although the two principles of erosion and sediment control are often used interchangeably, they are two separate issues and require different BMPs for mitigation. Erosion control is any practice that protects the soil surface and minimizes soil particle detachment by water or wind. Sediment control is any practice that traps the soil particles after detachment and transport. Typically, effective sediment control is more difficult and expensive than erosion control. While erosion can never be completely controlled, combining erosion and sediment control practices can significantly reduce sediment loss. To help ensure compliance, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) successfully evaluates the performance of erosion control materials and maintains an Approved Product List (APL). This project developed the formal protocol for a performance-based, sediment retention device testing program that will assist the designer/engineer in the selection of the most effective sediment control BMP. This project studied five temporary sediment control devices: geosynthetic dikes, wattles without coagulant, wattles with coagulant, silt fences, and rock check dams (riprap).
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
One of the problems facing designers/engineers in maintaining regulatory compliance with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) is the lack of quantifiable data to assist in selecting effective sediment control best management practices (BMPs). Although the two principles of erosion and sediment control are often used interchangeably, they are two separate issues and require different BMPs for mitigation. Erosion control is any practice that protects the soil surface and minimizes soil particle detachment by water or wind. Sediment control is any practice that traps the soil particles after detachment and transport. Typically, effective sediment control is more difficult and expensive than erosion control. While erosion can never be completely controlled, combining erosion and sediment control practices can significantly reduce sediment loss. To help ensure compliance, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) successfully evaluates the performance of erosion control materials and maintains an Approved Product List (APL). This project developed the formal protocol for a performance-based, sediment retention device testing program that will assist the designer/engineer in the selection of the most effective sediment control BMP. This project studied five temporary sediment control devices: geosynthetic dikes, wattles without coagulant, wattles with coagulant, silt fences, and rock check dams (riprap).
Key concepts: Sediment control, Erosion control, Sediment, Erosion, Environmental science, Silt, Control (management), Riprap