2013The Economic JournalOpen access

Peer Effects in Charitable Giving: Evidence from the (Running) Field

Sarah Smith, Frank Windmeijer, Edmund Wright

Open full text 223 citations

Abstract

There is a widespread belief that peer effects are important in charitable giving, but little evidence on how donors respond to their peers. Analysing a unique dataset of donations to online fundraising pages, we find positive and sizeable peer effects: a £10 increase in the mean of past donations increases giving by £2.50, on average. Donations respond to both very large and very small amounts and to changes in the mode. We find little evidence that donations signal charity quality – our preferred explanation is that donors use information on earlier donations to decide what is appropriate for them to give.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There is a widespread belief that peer effects are important in charitable giving, but little evidence on how donors respond to their peers. Analysing a unique dataset of donations to online fundraising pages, we find positive and sizeable peer effects: a £10 increase in the mean of past donations increases giving by £2.50, on average. Donations respond to both very large and very small amounts and to changes in the mode. We find little evidence that donations signal charity quality – our preferred explanation is that donors use information on earlier donations to decide what is appropriate for them to give.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 223 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There is a widespread belief that peer effects are important in charitable giving, but little evidence on how donors respond to their peers. Analysing a unique dataset of donations to online fundraising pages, we find positive and sizeable peer effects: a £10 increase in the mean of past donations increases giving by £2.50, on average. Donations respond to both very large and very small amounts and to changes in the mode. We find little evidence that donations signal charity quality – our preferred explanation is that donors use information on earlier donations to decide what is appropriate for them to give.

Key concepts: Peer effects, Quality (philosophy), Set (abstract data type), Economics, Social psychology, Public economics, Psychology, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Peer Effects in Charitable Giving: Evidence from the (Running) Field — Research Paper | ScholarLens