2008Clinical ChemistryOpen access

Quantification of Carnitine and Acylcarnitines in Biological Matrices by HPLC Electrospray Ionization– Mass Spectrometry

Paul E. Minkler, Maria S. K. Stoll, Stephen T. Ingalls, Shuming Yang, János Kerner, Charles L. Hoppel

Open full text 86 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Analysis of carnitine and acylcarnitines by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) has limitations. First, preparation of butyl esters partially hydrolyzes acylcarnitines. Second, isobaric nonacylcarnitine compounds yield false-positive results in acylcarnitine tests. Third, acylcarnitine constitutional isomers cannot be distinguished. METHODS: Carnitine and acylcarnitines were isolated by ion-exchange solid-phase extraction, derivatized with pentafluorophenacyl trifluoromethanesulfonate, separated by HPLC, and detected with an ion trap mass spectrometer. Carnitine was quantified with d(3)-carnitine as the internal standard. Acylcarnitines were quantified with 42 synthesized calibrators. The internal standards used were d(6)-acetyl-, d(3)-propionyl-, undecanoyl-, undecanedioyl-, and heptadecanoylcarnitine. RESULTS: Example recoveries [mean (SD)] were 69.4% (3.9%) for total carnitine, 83.1% (5.9%) for free carnitine, 102.2% (9.8%) for acetylcarnitine, and 107.2% (8.9%) for palmitoylcarnitine. Example imprecision results [mean (SD)] within runs (n = 6) and between runs (n = 18) were, respectively: total carnitine, 58.0 (0.9) and 57.4 (1.7) micromol/L; free carnitine, 44.6 (1.5) and 44.3 (1.2) micromol/L; acetylcarnitine, 7.74 (0.51) and 7.85 (0.69) micromol/L; and palmitoylcarnitine, 0.12 (0.01) and 0.11 (0.02) micromol/L. Standard-addition slopes and linear regression coefficients were 1.00 and 0.9998, respectively, for total carnitine added to plasma, 0.99 and 0.9997 for free carnitine added to plasma, 1.04 and 0.9972 for octanoylcarnitine added to skeletal muscle, and 1.05 and 0.9913 for palmitoylcarnitine added to skeletal muscle. Reference intervals for plasma, urine, and skeletal muscle are provided. CONCLUSIONS: This method for analysis of carnitine and acylcarnitines overcomes the observed limitations of MS/MS methods.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Analysis of carnitine and acylcarnitines by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) has limitations. First, preparation of butyl esters partially hydrolyzes acylcarnitines. Second, isobaric nonacylcarnitine compounds yield false-positive results in acylcarnitine tests. Third, acylcarnitine constitutional isomers cannot be distinguished. METHODS: Carnitine and acylcarnitines were isolated by ion-exchange solid-phase extraction, derivatized with pentafluorophenacyl trifluoromethanesulfonate, separated by HPLC, and detected with an ion trap mass spectrometer. Carnitine was quantified with d(3)-carnitine as the internal standard. Acylcarnitines were quantified with 42 synthesized calibrators. The internal standards used were d(6)-acetyl-, d(3)-propionyl-, undecanoyl-, undecanedioyl-, and heptadecanoylcarnitine. RESULTS: Example recoveries [mean (SD)] were 69.4% (3.9%) for total carnitine, 83.1% (5.9%) for free carnitine, 102.2% (9.8%) for acetylcarnitine, and 107.2% (8.9%) for palmitoylcarnitine. Example imprecision results [mean (SD)] within runs (n = 6) and between runs (n = 18) were, respectively: total carnitine, 58.0 (0.9) and 57.4 (1.7) micromol/L; free carnitine, 44.6 (1.5) and 44.3 (1.2) micromol/L; acetylcarnitine, 7.74 (0.51) and 7.85 (0.69) micromol/L; and palmitoylcarnitine, 0.12 (0.01) and 0.11 (0.02) micromol/L. Standard-addition slopes and linear regression coefficients were 1.00 and 0.9998, respectively, for total carnitine added to plasma, 0.99 and 0.9997 for free carnitine added to plasma, 1.04 and 0.9972 for octanoylcarnitine added to skeletal muscle, and 1.05 and 0.9913 for palmitoylcarnitine added to skeletal muscle. Reference intervals for plasma, urine, and skeletal muscle are provided. CONCLUSIONS: This method for analysis of carnitine and acylcarnitines overcomes the observed limitations of MS/MS methods.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 86 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Analysis of carnitine and acylcarnitines by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) has limitations. First, preparation of butyl esters partially hydrolyzes acylcarnitines. Second, isobaric nonacylcarnitine compounds yield false-positive results in acylcarnitine tests. Third, acylcarnitine constitutional isomers cannot be distinguished. METHODS: Carnitine and acylcarnitines were isolated by ion-exchange solid-phase extraction, derivatized with pentafluorophenacyl trifluoromethanesulfonate, separated by HPLC, and detected with an ion trap mass spectrometer. Carnitine was quantified with d(3)-carnitine as the internal standard. Acylcarnitines were quantified with 42 synthesized calibrators. The internal standards used were d(6)-acetyl-, d(3)-propionyl-, undecanoyl-, undecanedioyl-, and heptadecanoylcarnitine. RESULTS: Example recoveries [mean (SD)] were 69.4% (3.9%) for total carnitine, 83.1% (5.9%) for free carnitine, 102.2% (9.8%) for acetylcarnitine, and 107.2% (8.9%) for palmitoylcarnitine. Example imprecision results [mean (SD)] within runs (n = 6) and between runs (n = 18) were, respectively: total carnitine, 58.0 (0.9) and 57.4 (1.7) micromol/L; free carnitine, 44.6 (1.5) and 44.3 (1.2) micromol/L; acetylcarnitine, 7.74 (0.51) and 7.85 (0.69) micromol/L; and palmitoylcarnitine, 0.12 (0.01) and 0.11 (0.02) micromol/L. Standard-addition slopes and linear regression coefficients were 1.00 and 0.9998, respectively, for total carnitine added to plasma, 0.99 and 0.9997 for free carnitine added to plasma, 1.04 and 0.9972 for octanoylcarnitine added to skeletal muscle, and 1.05 and 0.9913 for palmitoylcarnitine added to skeletal muscle. Reference intervals for plasma, urine, and skeletal muscle are provided. CONCLUSIONS: This method for analysis of carnitine and acylcarnitines overcomes the observed limitations of MS/MS methods.

Key concepts: Acetylcarnitine, Carnitine, Palmitoylcarnitine, Chemistry, Chromatography, Mass spectrometry, Electrospray ionization, Tandem mass spectrometry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Quantification of Carnitine and Acylcarnitines in Biological Matrices by HPLC Electrospray Ionization– Mass Spectrometry — Research Paper | ScholarLens