1997•Water Resources ResearchRequires access

A systematic analysis of eight decades of incipient motion studies, with special reference to gravel‐bedded rivers

John M. Buffington, David R. Montgomery

Open publisher page 991 citations

Abstract

Data compiled from eight decades of incipient motion studies were used to calculate dimensionless critical shear stress values of the median grain size, . Calculated . values were stratified by initial motion definition, median grain size type (surface, subsurface, or laboratory mixture), relative roughness, and flow regime. A traditional Shields plot constructed from data that represent initial motion of the bed surface material reveals systematic methodological biases of incipient motion definition; . values determined from reference bed load transport rates and from visual observation of grain motion define subparallel Shields curves, with the latter generally underlying the former; values derived from competence functions define a separate but poorly developed field, while theoretical values predict a wide range of generally higher stresses that likely represent instantaneous, rather than time‐averaged, critical shear stresses. The available data indicate that for high critical boundary Reynolds numbers and low relative roughnesses typical of gravel‐bedded rivers, reference‐based and visually based studies have ranges of 0.052–0.086 and 0.030–0.073, respectively. The apparent lack of a universal for gravel‐bedded rivers warrants great care in choosing défendable values for particular applications.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Data compiled from eight decades of incipient motion studies were used to calculate dimensionless critical shear stress values of the median grain size, . Calculated . values were stratified by initial motion definition, median grain size type (surface, subsurface, or laboratory mixture), relative roughness, and flow regime. A traditional Shields plot constructed from data that represent initial motion of the bed surface material reveals systematic methodological biases of incipient motion definition; . values determined from reference bed load transport rates and from visual observation of grain motion define subparallel Shields curves, with the latter generally underlying the former; values derived from competence functions define a separate but poorly developed field, while theoretical values predict a wide range of generally higher stresses that likely represent instantaneous, rather than time‐averaged, critical shear stresses. The available data indicate that for high critical boundary Reynolds numbers and low relative roughnesses typical of gravel‐bedded rivers, reference‐based and visually based studies have ranges of 0.052–0.086 and 0.030–0.073, respectively. The apparent lack of a universal for gravel‐bedded rivers warrants great care in choosing défendable values for particular applications.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 991 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Data compiled from eight decades of incipient motion studies were used to calculate dimensionless critical shear stress values of the median grain size, . Calculated . values were stratified by initial motion definition, median grain size type (surface, subsurface, or laboratory mixture), relative roughness, and flow regime. A traditional Shields plot constructed from data that represent initial motion of the bed surface material reveals systematic methodological biases of incipient motion definition; . values determined from reference bed load transport rates and from visual observation of grain motion define subparallel Shields curves, with the latter generally underlying the former; values derived from competence functions define a separate but poorly developed field, while theoretical values predict a wide range of generally higher stresses that likely represent instantaneous, rather than time‐averaged, critical shear stresses. The available data indicate that for high critical boundary Reynolds numbers and low relative roughnesses typical of gravel‐bedded rivers, reference‐based and visually based studies have ranges of 0.052–0.086 and 0.030–0.073, respectively. The apparent lack of a universal for gravel‐bedded rivers warrants great care in choosing défendable values for particular applications.

Key concepts: Geology, Dimensionless quantity, Surface finish, Geotechnical engineering, Statistics, Hydrology (agriculture), Soil science, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A systematic analysis of eight decades of incipient motion studies, with special reference to gravel‐bedded rivers — Research Paper | ScholarLens