2011•Unpublished venueRequires access

Explanation on “annuities puzzle”

Yi Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The traditional theory of annuity demand thought a life-cycle consumer who pursued the maximization of consumption utility should fully annuitize all of their savings. The phenomenon that their theoretic conclusion does not accord with the reality was called “annuities puzzle”. Establishing a savings expected utility model that involves term insurance, annuity and security, we discuss the optimal choice of saving behavior of expected utility maximizers. We demonstrate that people without a bequest motive annuitize all savings if the annuities available are actuarially fair. If the annuities available are loading and there is no long-lived gain, or there is a bequest motive, full annuitization is not optimal. The conclusion then explains the “annuities puzzle”.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The traditional theory of annuity demand thought a life-cycle consumer who pursued the maximization of consumption utility should fully annuitize all of their savings. The phenomenon that their theoretic conclusion does not accord with the reality was called “annuities puzzle”. Establishing a savings expected utility model that involves term insurance, annuity and security, we discuss the optimal choice of saving behavior of expected utility maximizers. We demonstrate that people without a bequest motive annuitize all savings if the annuities available are actuarially fair. If the annuities available are loading and there is no long-lived gain, or there is a bequest motive, full annuitization is not optimal. The conclusion then explains the “annuities puzzle”.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The traditional theory of annuity demand thought a life-cycle consumer who pursued the maximization of consumption utility should fully annuitize all of their savings. The phenomenon that their theoretic conclusion does not accord with the reality was called “annuities puzzle”. Establishing a savings expected utility model that involves term insurance, annuity and security, we discuss the optimal choice of saving behavior of expected utility maximizers. We demonstrate that people without a bequest motive annuitize all savings if the annuities available are actuarially fair. If the annuities available are loading and there is no long-lived gain, or there is a bequest motive, full annuitization is not optimal. The conclusion then explains the “annuities puzzle”.

Key concepts: Bequest, Annuity, Life annuity, Economics, Utility maximization, Consumption (sociology), Overlapping generations model, Expected utility hypothesis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Explanation on “annuities puzzle” — Research Paper | ScholarLens