2005•Unpublished venueRequires access

The Future of Social Capital in Development Economics Research

Stephen Knowles

Open publisher page 22 citations

Abstract

Social capital is generally interpreted as the degree of trust, co-operative norms and networks and associations within a society. Economists have become increasingly interested in social capital, following the seminal work of Coleman (1988) and Putnam (1993). Since the publication of these studies a vast quantity of research on social capital has been published by economists, as well as researchers from other academic disciplines. This paper critiques a selection of the literature on social capital, in terms of its definition, measurement and effects. In terms of definitions, it is argued that social capital is a very similar concept to informal institutions, as defined by North (1990). It is argued that parallels can be drawn between the literature on social capital, and the empirical literature on the role of institutions as a deep determinant of economic development. Turning to the future of social capital research, it is argued that valuable insights can be gleaned from the institutions literature.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Social capital is generally interpreted as the degree of trust, co-operative norms and networks and associations within a society. Economists have become increasingly interested in social capital, following the seminal work of Coleman (1988) and Putnam (1993). Since the publication of these studies a vast quantity of research on social capital has been published by economists, as well as researchers from other academic disciplines. This paper critiques a selection of the literature on social capital, in terms of its definition, measurement and effects. In terms of definitions, it is argued that social capital is a very similar concept to informal institutions, as defined by North (1990). It is argued that parallels can be drawn between the literature on social capital, and the empirical literature on the role of institutions as a deep determinant of economic development. Turning to the future of social capital research, it is argued that valuable insights can be gleaned from the institutions literature.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Social capital is generally interpreted as the degree of trust, co-operative norms and networks and associations within a society. Economists have become increasingly interested in social capital, following the seminal work of Coleman (1988) and Putnam (1993). Since the publication of these studies a vast quantity of research on social capital has been published by economists, as well as researchers from other academic disciplines. This paper critiques a selection of the literature on social capital, in terms of its definition, measurement and effects. In terms of definitions, it is argued that social capital is a very similar concept to informal institutions, as defined by North (1990). It is argued that parallels can be drawn between the literature on social capital, and the empirical literature on the role of institutions as a deep determinant of economic development. Turning to the future of social capital research, it is argued that valuable insights can be gleaned from the institutions literature.

Key concepts: Social capital, Social reproduction, Individual capital, Positive economics, Capital (architecture), Parallels, Economics, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Future of Social Capital in Development Economics Research — Research Paper | ScholarLens