2012arXiv (Cornell University)Open access

Uncomputability and free will

Chetan S. Mandayam Nayakar, R. Srikanth

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

The basic problem posed by free will (FW) for physics appears to be not the \textit{physical} one of whether it is compatible with the laws of physics, but the \textit{logical} one of how to consistently define it, since it incorporates the contrary notions of freedom, which suggests indeterminism, as well as control, which bespeaks determinism. We argue that it must be a fundamentally new causal primitive, in addition to determinism and indeterminism. In particular, we identify FW in a physical theory with dynamics that is uncomputable, and hence effectively indeterministic within the theory. On the other hand, it would be deterministic in a higher order theory. An important consequence for artificial intelligence (AI) is that the FW aspect of cognitive systems may be fundamentally unsimulable. An implication for neuroscience is that FW will in general be experimentally undemonstrable. Apparently, it can only be subjectively experienced.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The basic problem posed by free will (FW) for physics appears to be not the \textit{physical} one of whether it is compatible with the laws of physics, but the \textit{logical} one of how to consistently define it, since it incorporates the contrary notions of freedom, which suggests indeterminism, as well as control, which bespeaks determinism. We argue that it must be a fundamentally new causal primitive, in addition to determinism and indeterminism. In particular, we identify FW in a physical theory with dynamics that is uncomputable, and hence effectively indeterministic within the theory. On the other hand, it would be deterministic in a higher order theory. An important consequence for artificial intelligence (AI) is that the FW aspect of cognitive systems may be fundamentally unsimulable. An implication for neuroscience is that FW will in general be experimentally undemonstrable. Apparently, it can only be subjectively experienced.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The basic problem posed by free will (FW) for physics appears to be not the \textit{physical} one of whether it is compatible with the laws of physics, but the \textit{logical} one of how to consistently define it, since it incorporates the contrary notions of freedom, which suggests indeterminism, as well as control, which bespeaks determinism. We argue that it must be a fundamentally new causal primitive, in addition to determinism and indeterminism. In particular, we identify FW in a physical theory with dynamics that is uncomputable, and hence effectively indeterministic within the theory. On the other hand, it would be deterministic in a higher order theory. An important consequence for artificial intelligence (AI) is that the FW aspect of cognitive systems may be fundamentally unsimulable. An implication for neuroscience is that FW will in general be experimentally undemonstrable. Apparently, it can only be subjectively experienced.

Key concepts: Indeterminism, Determinism, Free will, Epistemology, Physical law, Causal theory of reference, Order (exchange), Cognitive science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Uncomputability and free will — Research Paper | ScholarLens