1981•New Zealand Journal of BotanyRequires access

Consequences of long‐distance dispersal of plant macrofossils

Robert S. Hill

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Summary Long‐distance dispersal of plant macrofossils is a commonly recognised phenomenon, but in most fossil assemblages it is difficult to determine its extent. Long‐distance dispersal will probably affect any analysis based on foliar physiognomy (leaf size and margin type), particularly if it causes species from more than one vegetation type to be present in the assemblage. Mbre serious objections to the use of foliar physiognomy, particularly for estimating palaeoclimates and vegetation types, arc the frequent over‐abundance of streamand lake‐side plants in deposits and the current lack of knowledge of the representation of surrounding vegetation in depositional sites.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary Long‐distance dispersal of plant macrofossils is a commonly recognised phenomenon, but in most fossil assemblages it is difficult to determine its extent. Long‐distance dispersal will probably affect any analysis based on foliar physiognomy (leaf size and margin type), particularly if it causes species from more than one vegetation type to be present in the assemblage. Mbre serious objections to the use of foliar physiognomy, particularly for estimating palaeoclimates and vegetation types, arc the frequent over‐abundance of streamand lake‐side plants in deposits and the current lack of knowledge of the representation of surrounding vegetation in depositional sites.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary Long‐distance dispersal of plant macrofossils is a commonly recognised phenomenon, but in most fossil assemblages it is difficult to determine its extent. Long‐distance dispersal will probably affect any analysis based on foliar physiognomy (leaf size and margin type), particularly if it causes species from more than one vegetation type to be present in the assemblage. Mbre serious objections to the use of foliar physiognomy, particularly for estimating palaeoclimates and vegetation types, arc the frequent over‐abundance of streamand lake‐side plants in deposits and the current lack of knowledge of the representation of surrounding vegetation in depositional sites.

Key concepts: Macrofossil, Physiognomy, Biological dispersal, Vegetation (pathology), Ecology, Paleoecology, Sedimentary depositional environment, Abundance (ecology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Consequences of long‐distance dispersal of plant macrofossils — Research Paper | ScholarLens