2002Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparative in vivo and ex vivo pacing and sensing performance study using isolated four-chamber working swine heart model

Timothy G. Laske, Nicholas D. Skadsberg, Paul A. Iaizzo

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

A study was conducted comparing the pacing and sensing performance of an endocardial pacing lead (5076, Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN) in vivo to an ex vivo isolated heart model designed to work all four chambers under simulated in vivo physiologic conditions. The lead was implanted in vivo using fluoroscopic guidance. Standard stimulation and sensing parameters were recorded. Using standard cardiac surgical techniques, 8 porcine hearts were excised and reperfused in a working heart model retaining their original lead placement. Following stabilization, the electrical measurements were repeated. Ex vivo electrical values were significantly decreased relative to the in vivo measurements: R-wave amplitude by 39%, P-wave amplitude by 39%, slew rate by 62%, and pacing impedance by 34%. Pacing threshold values were similar in vivo and ex vivo. Variations in performance were in part attributed to local tissue deformation in the isolated heart preparation leading to differences in lead slack and orientation. This comparative study substantiated the value of utilizing the isolated heart model to visualize and simultaneously evaluate lead pacing and sensing performance in comparison with in vivo experimental procedures.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A study was conducted comparing the pacing and sensing performance of an endocardial pacing lead (5076, Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN) in vivo to an ex vivo isolated heart model designed to work all four chambers under simulated in vivo physiologic conditions. The lead was implanted in vivo using fluoroscopic guidance. Standard stimulation and sensing parameters were recorded. Using standard cardiac surgical techniques, 8 porcine hearts were excised and reperfused in a working heart model retaining their original lead placement. Following stabilization, the electrical measurements were repeated. Ex vivo electrical values were significantly decreased relative to the in vivo measurements: R-wave amplitude by 39%, P-wave amplitude by 39%, slew rate by 62%, and pacing impedance by 34%. Pacing threshold values were similar in vivo and ex vivo. Variations in performance were in part attributed to local tissue deformation in the isolated heart preparation leading to differences in lead slack and orientation. This comparative study substantiated the value of utilizing the isolated heart model to visualize and simultaneously evaluate lead pacing and sensing performance in comparison with in vivo experimental procedures.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A study was conducted comparing the pacing and sensing performance of an endocardial pacing lead (5076, Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN) in vivo to an ex vivo isolated heart model designed to work all four chambers under simulated in vivo physiologic conditions. The lead was implanted in vivo using fluoroscopic guidance. Standard stimulation and sensing parameters were recorded. Using standard cardiac surgical techniques, 8 porcine hearts were excised and reperfused in a working heart model retaining their original lead placement. Following stabilization, the electrical measurements were repeated. Ex vivo electrical values were significantly decreased relative to the in vivo measurements: R-wave amplitude by 39%, P-wave amplitude by 39%, slew rate by 62%, and pacing impedance by 34%. Pacing threshold values were similar in vivo and ex vivo. Variations in performance were in part attributed to local tissue deformation in the isolated heart preparation leading to differences in lead slack and orientation. This comparative study substantiated the value of utilizing the isolated heart model to visualize and simultaneously evaluate lead pacing and sensing performance in comparison with in vivo experimental procedures.

Key concepts: In vivo, Ex vivo, Biomedical engineering, Lead (geology), Materials science, Medicine, Cardiology, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative in vivo and ex vivo pacing and sensing performance study using isolated four-chamber working swine heart model — Research Paper | ScholarLens