2004Journal of orthopaedic surgeryOpen access

Comparing Wound Complication Rates following Closure of Hip Wounds with Metallic Skin Staples or Subcuticular Vicryl Suture: A Prospective Randomised Trial

AA Shetty, VS Kumar, C. V. J. Morgan-Hough, GA Georgeu, Kyle D. James, JE Nicholl

Open full text 108 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare 2 methods of wound closure-metallic staples or 3-0 undyed vicryl-according to postoperative wound complication rates. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for proximal femoral fractures were randomised to have wound closure with metallic staples or with subcuticular vicryl suture. Wounds were regularly examined postoperatively and only those with positive wound swabs were regarded as wound infections. RESULTS: Five infections and one superficial wound dehiscence occurred in the patients who had wound closure with metallic staples. The complication rate was significantly higher for this group compared with the group who had wound closure with subcuticular vicryl suture (p<0.025). CONCLUSION: Superficial wound complication rates are higher for wounds closed with metallic staples compared to wounds closed with subcuticular vicryl.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: To compare 2 methods of wound closure-metallic staples or 3-0 undyed vicryl-according to postoperative wound complication rates. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for proximal femoral fractures were randomised to have wound closure with metallic staples or with subcuticular vicryl suture. Wounds were regularly examined postoperatively and only those with positive wound swabs were regarded as wound infections. RESULTS: Five infections and one superficial wound dehiscence occurred in the patients who had wound closure with metallic staples. The complication rate was significantly higher for this group compared with the group who had wound closure with subcuticular vicryl suture (p<0.025). CONCLUSION: Superficial wound complication rates are higher for wounds closed with metallic staples compared to wounds closed with subcuticular vicryl.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 108 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: To compare 2 methods of wound closure-metallic staples or 3-0 undyed vicryl-according to postoperative wound complication rates. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for proximal femoral fractures were randomised to have wound closure with metallic staples or with subcuticular vicryl suture. Wounds were regularly examined postoperatively and only those with positive wound swabs were regarded as wound infections. RESULTS: Five infections and one superficial wound dehiscence occurred in the patients who had wound closure with metallic staples. The complication rate was significantly higher for this group compared with the group who had wound closure with subcuticular vicryl suture (p<0.025). CONCLUSION: Superficial wound complication rates are higher for wounds closed with metallic staples compared to wounds closed with subcuticular vicryl.

Key concepts: Vicryl, Medicine, Surgery, Complication, Fibrous joint, Wound dehiscence, Dehiscence, Wound closure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparing Wound Complication Rates following Closure of Hip Wounds with Metallic Skin Staples or Subcuticular Vicryl Suture: A Prospective Randomised Trial — Research Paper | ScholarLens