2002•Unpublished venueRequires access

Performance comparison between ECN and BECN

Zhigao Chen, Shengming Jiang, Shoukang Zheng, Chi Chung Ko

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

There have been some concerns and doubts impeding the adoption of backward-ECN since it was proposed as an alternative approach to ECN (explicit congestion notification). In this paper, we attempt to clarify these controversial issues through a performance comparison between these two schemes. A simple steady state model is developed to reveal the throughput characterization of our revised BECN scheme. Simulation results are presented to provide operational evidence to weigh the benefits that BECN brings in terms of goodput and other metrics. Our studies indicate that BECN exhibits a better congestion control behaviour than ECN under the investigated high speed network circumstance. The results also show that ICMP (Internet control message protocol) source quench in conjunction with the RED (random early detection) marking algorithm appears a practical and efficient congestion notification solution to BECN.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There have been some concerns and doubts impeding the adoption of backward-ECN since it was proposed as an alternative approach to ECN (explicit congestion notification). In this paper, we attempt to clarify these controversial issues through a performance comparison between these two schemes. A simple steady state model is developed to reveal the throughput characterization of our revised BECN scheme. Simulation results are presented to provide operational evidence to weigh the benefits that BECN brings in terms of goodput and other metrics. Our studies indicate that BECN exhibits a better congestion control behaviour than ECN under the investigated high speed network circumstance. The results also show that ICMP (Internet control message protocol) source quench in conjunction with the RED (random early detection) marking algorithm appears a practical and efficient congestion notification solution to BECN.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There have been some concerns and doubts impeding the adoption of backward-ECN since it was proposed as an alternative approach to ECN (explicit congestion notification). In this paper, we attempt to clarify these controversial issues through a performance comparison between these two schemes. A simple steady state model is developed to reveal the throughput characterization of our revised BECN scheme. Simulation results are presented to provide operational evidence to weigh the benefits that BECN brings in terms of goodput and other metrics. Our studies indicate that BECN exhibits a better congestion control behaviour than ECN under the investigated high speed network circumstance. The results also show that ICMP (Internet control message protocol) source quench in conjunction with the RED (random early detection) marking algorithm appears a practical and efficient congestion notification solution to BECN.

Key concepts: Goodput, Explicit Congestion Notification, Computer science, Internet Control Message Protocol, Network congestion, Computer network, Throughput, Active queue management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Performance comparison between ECN and BECN — Research Paper | ScholarLens