2014•Journal of Clinical PathologyRequires access

CEP17 copy number increase does not indicate polysomy 17

Cathy Beatrice Moelans, P. J. van Diest

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

We read with interest the article by Orsaria et al 1 on chromosome 17 ‘polysomy’ in invasive breast carcinoma, and its correlation with histological parameters and HER2 gene amplification. Although the authors mentioned briefly that ‘a simple increase of CEP17 copy number does not necessarily represent the presence of multiple copies of chromosome 17’ and that ‘focal pericentromeric gain or partial polysomy has been shown to exist in a majority of the so-called polysomy 17 cases’, they consistently use the term ‘polysomy 17’ throughout their manuscript, whereas, their definition of polysomy is based on the presence of ≥3 …

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We read with interest the article by Orsaria et al 1 on chromosome 17 ‘polysomy’ in invasive breast carcinoma, and its correlation with histological parameters and HER2 gene amplification. Although the authors mentioned briefly that ‘a simple increase of CEP17 copy number does not necessarily represent the presence of multiple copies of chromosome 17’ and that ‘focal pericentromeric gain or partial polysomy has been shown to exist in a majority of the so-called polysomy 17 cases’, they consistently use the term ‘polysomy 17’ throughout their manuscript, whereas, their definition of polysomy is based on the presence of ≥3 …

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We read with interest the article by Orsaria et al 1 on chromosome 17 ‘polysomy’ in invasive breast carcinoma, and its correlation with histological parameters and HER2 gene amplification. Although the authors mentioned briefly that ‘a simple increase of CEP17 copy number does not necessarily represent the presence of multiple copies of chromosome 17’ and that ‘focal pericentromeric gain or partial polysomy has been shown to exist in a majority of the so-called polysomy 17 cases’, they consistently use the term ‘polysomy 17’ throughout their manuscript, whereas, their definition of polysomy is based on the presence of ≥3 …

Key concepts: Polysomy, Chromosome, Biology, Genetics, Gene, Fluorescence in situ hybridization

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
CEP17 copy number increase does not indicate polysomy 17 — Research Paper | ScholarLens