2008Acta Geologica Sinica - English EditionRequires access

Isotopes and Geochronology of the Meixian‐type Pb‐Zn‐(Ag) Deposits, Central Fujian Rift, South China: Implications for Geological Events

Feng Chengyou, ZHANG Dequan, Daxin Li, Hongquan She, Yingjun Dong

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Central Fujian Rift is another new and important volcanogenic massive sulfide Pb‐Zn polymetallic metallogenetic belt. In order to find out the material genesis and mineralization period of Meixian‐type Pb‐Zn‐Ag deposits, S and Pb isotope analysis and isotope geochronology of ores and wall rocks for five major deposits are discussed. It is concluded that the composition of sulfur isotope from sulfide ore vary slightly in different deposits and the mean value is close to zero with the δ34S ranging from −3.5%‰ to +5.6%‰ averaging at +2.0‰, which indicates that the sulfur might originate from magma or possibly erupted directly from volcano or was leached from ore‐hosted volcanic rock. The lead from ores in most deposits displays radioactive genesis character (206Pb/204Pb>18.140, 207Pb/204Pb>15.584, 208Pb/204Pb>38.569) and lead isotope values of ores are higher than those of wall rocks, which indicates that the lead was likely leached from the ore‐hosted volcanic rocks. Based on isotope data, two significant Pb‐Zn metallogenesis are delineated, which are Mid‐ and Late‐Proterozoic sedimentary exhalative metallogenesis (The single zircon U‐Pb, Sm‐Nd isochronal and Ar‐Ar dating ages of ore‐hosted wall rocks are calculated to be among 933–1788 Ma.) and Yanshanian magmatic hydrothermal superimposed and alternated metallogenesis (intrusive SHRIMP zircon U‐Pb and Rb‐Sr isochronal ages between 127–154 Ma).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Central Fujian Rift is another new and important volcanogenic massive sulfide Pb‐Zn polymetallic metallogenetic belt. In order to find out the material genesis and mineralization period of Meixian‐type Pb‐Zn‐Ag deposits, S and Pb isotope analysis and isotope geochronology of ores and wall rocks for five major deposits are discussed. It is concluded that the composition of sulfur isotope from sulfide ore vary slightly in different deposits and the mean value is close to zero with the δ34S ranging from −3.5%‰ to +5.6%‰ averaging at +2.0‰, which indicates that the sulfur might originate from magma or possibly erupted directly from volcano or was leached from ore‐hosted volcanic rock. The lead from ores in most deposits displays radioactive genesis character (206Pb/204Pb>18.140, 207Pb/204Pb>15.584, 208Pb/204Pb>38.569) and lead isotope values of ores are higher than those of wall rocks, which indicates that the lead was likely leached from the ore‐hosted volcanic rocks. Based on isotope data, two significant Pb‐Zn metallogenesis are delineated, which are Mid‐ and Late‐Proterozoic sedimentary exhalative metallogenesis (The single zircon U‐Pb, Sm‐Nd isochronal and Ar‐Ar dating ages of ore‐hosted wall rocks are calculated to be among 933–1788 Ma.) and Yanshanian magmatic hydrothermal superimposed and alternated metallogenesis (intrusive SHRIMP zircon U‐Pb and Rb‐Sr isochronal ages between 127–154 Ma).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Central Fujian Rift is another new and important volcanogenic massive sulfide Pb‐Zn polymetallic metallogenetic belt. In order to find out the material genesis and mineralization period of Meixian‐type Pb‐Zn‐Ag deposits, S and Pb isotope analysis and isotope geochronology of ores and wall rocks for five major deposits are discussed. It is concluded that the composition of sulfur isotope from sulfide ore vary slightly in different deposits and the mean value is close to zero with the δ34S ranging from −3.5%‰ to +5.6%‰ averaging at +2.0‰, which indicates that the sulfur might originate from magma or possibly erupted directly from volcano or was leached from ore‐hosted volcanic rock. The lead from ores in most deposits displays radioactive genesis character (206Pb/204Pb>18.140, 207Pb/204Pb>15.584, 208Pb/204Pb>38.569) and lead isotope values of ores are higher than those of wall rocks, which indicates that the lead was likely leached from the ore‐hosted volcanic rocks. Based on isotope data, two significant Pb‐Zn metallogenesis are delineated, which are Mid‐ and Late‐Proterozoic sedimentary exhalative metallogenesis (The single zircon U‐Pb, Sm‐Nd isochronal and Ar‐Ar dating ages of ore‐hosted wall rocks are calculated to be among 933–1788 Ma.) and Yanshanian magmatic hydrothermal superimposed and alternated metallogenesis (intrusive SHRIMP zircon U‐Pb and Rb‐Sr isochronal ages between 127–154 Ma).

Key concepts: Zircon, Geology, Geochemistry, Geochronology, Sedimentary rock, Proterozoic, Rift, Mineralization (soil science)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Isotopes and Geochronology of the Meixian‐type Pb‐Zn‐(Ag) Deposits, Central Fujian Rift, South China: Implications for Geological Events — Research Paper | ScholarLens